
The Democratic Party owes a sincere apology to George Bush, Dick Cheney and company for enthusiastically embracing many of the very Terrorism policies which caused them to hurl such vehement invective at the GOP for all those years. And progressives who support the views of the majority as expressed by this poll should never be listened to again the next time they want to pretend to oppose civilian slaughter and civil liberties assaults when perpetrated by the next Republican President (it should be noted that roughly 35% of liberals, a non-trivial amount, say they oppose these Obama policies).
One final point: I’ve often made the case that one of the most consequential aspects of the Obama legacy is that he has transformed what was once known as “right-wing shredding of the Constitution” into bipartisan consensus, and this is exactly what I mean. When one of the two major parties supports a certain policy and the other party pretends to oppose it — as happened with these radical War on Terror policies during the Bush years — then public opinion is divisive on the question, sharply split. But once the policy becomes the hallmark of both political parties, then public opinion becomes robust in support of it. That’s because people assume that if both political parties support a certain policy that it must be wise, and because policies that enjoy the status of bipartisan consensus are removed from the realm of mainstream challenge. That’s what Barack Obama has done to these Bush/Cheney policies: he has, as Jack Goldsmith predicted he would back in 2009, shielded and entrenched them as standard U.S. policy for at least a generation, and (by leading his supporters to embrace these policies as their own) has done so with far more success than any GOP President ever could have dreamed of achieving.
Only Nixon can go to China.
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
Shedding Skins
4 years ago, I was a liberal. Not any more. The name of my personal blog is Turning Points and the election of Obama (and my complicity in that event) was the most important turning point in my life - one that I didn't recognize at the time. Someone here commented recently that one does not suddenly wake up and become an anarcho-syndicalist. Quite right. For me, it has taken about three years.
The important thing is to never stop questioning. - Albert Einstein
Anarchism smacks you in the
Anarchism smacks you in the face. It's actually really quite amusing, and it will change the world immensely for the better. ;-P
Some of it!
Not all of it, as with any "ism."
I think consensus-based decision making has a lot to be said for it. That's anarchistic, at least. Then again, it's also (so far as I can tell) OK to piss all over the consensus based on autonomy. And that's anarchistic too.
Fine, except if you got sold on the idea of going to Occupy with your kid in a stroller because it was announced as non-violent, and then some black bloc wanker heaves a rock through a Starbucks window.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi