Barack Obama 2.0 (Political Wire)
President-elect Obama’s political team “is quietly planning for a nationwide hiring binge that would marshal an army of full-time organizers to press the new president’s agenda and lay the foundation for his reelection,” the Los Angeles Times reports. “Organizers and even Republicans say the scope of this permanent campaign structure is unprecedented for a president. People familiar with the plan say Obama’s team would use the network in part to pressure lawmakers — particularly wavering Democrats — to help him pass complex legislation on the economy, healthcare and energy.”
Obama makes pitch for ideas, e-mail addresses (AP, thanks to sm77 at The Confluence)
WASHINGTON – Barack Obama’s high-tech bandwagon is rolling on, combining information on inauguration events with a pitch for cash to pay for them. The president-elect’s aides told supporters Wednesday that they could learn by e-mail about community service projects around the country tied to his swearing-in Jan. 20; that they could receive updates by cell phone on traffic and events in the nation’s capital; that the best of their ideas on how to govern, submitted on his Web site, would get his attention. In the process, the Obama team collected more data about potential supporters and donors.
Obama-Biden Transition Team (via email)
Dear Carolyn, We wanted to tell you about a new feature on Change.gov which lets you bring your ideas directly to the President. It’s called the Citizen’s Briefing Book, and it’s an online forum where you can share your ideas, and rate or offer comments on the ideas of others. The best-rated ones will rise to the top, and after the Inauguration, we’ll print them out and gather them into a binder like the ones the President receives every day from experts and advisors. If you participate, your idea could be included in the Citizen’s Briefing Book to be delivered to President Obama. Visit the Citizen’s Briefing Book now and share your ideas.
So I’m a sucker. I keep hoping like hell that somehow, some way, those entrusted with carrying out the people’s business will actually care what we the people think is our business and what we want carried out on our behalf. I once thought MoveOn was a vehicle to make that happen, and it turned out to be another top-down hoax. And if it’s OUR input that will guide policy, why does Obama thinks he needs to sell it to us? See below.—Caro
Obama heading to Ohio to promote stimulus (AP)
WASHINGTON - Barack Obama is going back on the road — even before he’s sworn into office.
This is exactly how Bush tried to sell his policies.—Caro
A scary analogy (by Paul Krugman)
Mark Thoma: “I think the stimulus package is like driving up an icy hill. If you don’t have enough momentum from the start and fail to provide enough “stimulus” to get the car over the crest of the hill, you can slide all the way back to the bottom, crashing into things along the way and ending up worse off than when you started…” I’d add that there may also be a political tipping point: if the stimulus package is too weak, conservatives will pile on after it fails to deliver, claiming that the whole concept has been discredited.
It’s what conservatives do best: Throw a wrench in Democrats’ plans and then blame Democrats for the failure of those plans. And Democrats just keep participating. One has to wonder if Democrats aren’t just as willing as the conservatives to have the plans derailed. Kabuki on the Potomac.—Caro
The Party of No Ideas (by Joe Conason)
Would it be rude to ask whether the Republicans have any new proposals to save the country from this worsening recession? The question arises not because anyone expects the minority party to burst forth with creative ideas, but because conservatives in Congress and the media seem so determined to thwart or stall the economic stimulus plans of President-elect Barack Obama… [T]heir real message is that the best thing to do for America is to do nothing at all, except to maintain or worsen the inequities of our tax system… [I]nertia is the right’s program, whether we listen to the Republican Congressional leaders, the Heritage analysts or the conservative pundits. They are determined to sabotage constructive action by the new administration. They cannot let go of their ideology, regardless of the pain that will be inflicted as the recession deepens.
But we’re supposed to be all lovey-dovey and bipartisan now, Joe. Didn’t you get the memo?—Caro
Click here for more politics and media news headlines.
Carolyn Kay
MakeThemAccountable.com
- Caro's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[encrypted]+#b94+








Comments
Wavering Democrats to the right?
Or wavering Democrats to the left? That's the question.
Obama does like having his gangs in place.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays
OOh, I do like ...
... that tagline.
it is a good idea
had Clinton done something like this not only would his health care plan passed, we would never have lost our majorities. Also, activism begats activism, this will stir up a lot of progressive organizing Obama will not be able to control.
Obama is the political version of Oprah.
I wrote an internet strategy ...
... for Rod Blagojevich when he first ran for governor in 2002 that included a lot of this stuff. (That was before we knew what an enthusiastic participant in pay to play he would be.) Blago's staff wasn't interested, but much of what I recommended is what the Obama team is doing, and of course I never made a dime from it.
My problem has always been that I see possibilities way before most people do.
I see this as forming the Obama-Biden police
Ya know, the ones who are supposed to convince us even though we know they are wrong. Good ideas can be used for ill ends just as easily as they can be used for good ends.
Only tyrants rig elections.
Yes, ...
... and as we've seen, the policing can be quite vicious.
They have to kill us to save us.
Yeah, stupid Bill Clinton
Raising taxes on the wealthy, trying to integrate the military, and passing the assault weapons ban. Grover Norquist types, military brass types, and the NRA had nothing to do with losing the Dem majority. I always forget how stupid Bill Clinton was as president for being personally responsible for the loss of Congress. I need to reread the village and anti-village-village memos again.
Only tyrants rig elections.
Yeah and while you're at it you can
remind us why perpetual campaigns always result in good government. I mean, it worked for Rove and W, right? What could possibly go wrong?
Heh. Citizen's Briefing Book!
Recalling that that legalizing pot was the number one uncensored concern of the OFB
, I bet the Resident-Select will be up all night reading the CBB.
"marshal an army of full-time organizer" - his political police
No, definitely not a good thing, as Obama proved over the primaries who his army is meant to shout down/surpress (the left), and how unruly and nasty the army can get.
Sorry, but Obama can't handle his organizational army, and thus he shouldn't be trusted with one. It's not an army; its a political police force, and one aimed in the wrong direction.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...