Cross-posted from The Global Sociology Blog.
Via McClatchy,
"A Senate committee on Thursday heard appeals for the creation of a federal task force to combat polygamist sects that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid described as sophisticated organized crime rings.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, whose office has received nationwide attention for its investigation of a sect in Texas, was among those backing legislation sponsored by Reid, D-Nev. The bill would establish a task force in the U.S. Department of Justice and assist victims of polygamist groups.
The hearing, which included testimony from two former sect members, spotlighted the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Saints (FLDS) led by Warren Jeffs, who was once on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List. Jeffs and four of his followers were indicted Tuesday by a grand jury in Texas for felony assault of a child.
Abbott told reporters after the hearing that further action is likely as investigators sift through "boxes and boxes" of documents and examine other evidence. "I would say we're in the early stages of our investigation," Abbott said.
Reid, who once took on mob bosses when he sought to clean up Las Vegas casinos as chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission, told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that polygamist sects are a "form of organized crime" that have spread into numerous states, as well as Canada and Mexico.
"I am not saying that they are the same thing as the crime syndicates that used to run Las Vegas," Reid said. "But they engage in an ongoing pattern of serious
crimes that we ignore at our peril."
He cited a "web of criminal conduct that includes welfare fraud, tax evasion, massive corruption and strong-arm tactics." "
All I can say is "Geez, what took you so long." It's not like there is not a wealth of evidence of the wrongdoings of the sect (Sarah's Blog here is your one-stop shop for all things FLDS). What has been missing (and still might be, we will see) is the political will to go after a fundamentalist religious group for fear of being perceived as anti-religion.
Locally, the political problem is the presence of FLDS in current law enforcement agencies or of ancestors who practiced polygamy among criminal justice officials. Either way, the sect has enjoyed impunity thanks to this ambivalence.
On the one hand, you all the trappings of a cult in order to strictly control the members and have limited leaks into the outside world (with enforcers if necessary). On the other hand, you have an organization dedicated to the economic exploitation of its members as well as massive fraud on government money to finance the lavish lifestyles of the prophets and their cronies.
So, what are the odds of success this time?
"Abbott said Reid's legislation is necessary because polygamist groups are becoming a national problem. The state's current investigation may not have been necessary if a task force had been in place five or 10 years ago, he said.
But U.S. Attorney Brett Tolman of Utah said that a task force "may not be a good fit" in investigating polygamist sects. The communities are self-contained and hard to penetrate, and their members are frequently uncooperative with law enforcement, he said.
"In this context, a task force may be too blunt an instrument to accomplish an effective investigation," he said."
Well, there goes your political will right there. Maybe, just maybe, one could look at the strategies that have worked with organized criminal organizations and cults, so as to get a few ideas about how to proceed. From my readings, it seems that successful prosecutions against organized criminal organizations (especially in Italy) have combined "follow the money" strategies, along with recruiting informants (with promises of immunity) and patient gathering of evidence followed by massive raids against the heads of the organizations. How about starting with that?
- FrenchDoc's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Front page
Comments
is it too much to hope
that something will actually be done?
You already know the answer to that one, DCB
Simple answer to simple question: yes (it's too much to hope).
I wonder what Hatch and Bennett have to say
Sen. Reid is a member of the Mormon Church. So are Republican Sens. Hatch and Bennett of Utah. This is a tough subject for the Senate to take on without two out of three of those senators taking the lead. (I don't know if any other senators are Mormon.)
There's a long history of nutty Libertarians not associated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in the Southwest siding with the polygamists over the years and making trouble for state politicians who have tried to take on this issue.
Not Sure
I'm not sure it's just nutty Libertarians, but an underlying American current of "live and let live" when it comes to religion. That's not even to mention Waco being an Alamo moment not just for these groups, but a large and diverse segement of the country.
Liberals have been terrible on this issue
as they are on women's issues generally, cf. the Obama campaign.
Over at TalkLeft it was "time for these children to be returned to their parents." Yuck.
I applaud Abbott and Reid. It is a beginning of a reality based approach.
I couldn't believe that Talk Left post
But I guess they saw it as a matter of freedom of religion and overzealous state interference... I don't.
And as a general rule, all politicians tip toe around religious issues. Conservatives, by definition tend to agree with religious conservatives and liberals are either afraid of being seen as anti-religion (and thanks to Obama for pushing that meme) or you have to listen to the concern trolls like Amy Sullivan telling you that the big electoral winning strategy is to attract evangelicals (sounds familiar?).
In that context, religious fundies of all tripes can get away with a lot of stuff.
"religious fundies of all tripes"
Truer words...
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
"Children re-united..."
"... with their MR SUBLIMINAL abusive families" was the tack our famously free press took.
Honestly, what progressives ought to do is form our own religion. We'd get everything, finally, including fawning coverage in the press.
Good point on the "Alamo moment." I agree.
[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.
Isn't Obama our own religion?
With one-stop contributing (give him all your money and he'll take care of everything!)
I'm sure there's a "religion" we at CW
could all share (truth?) but let's watch the being-so-like-them-we-become-them problem, okay?
Also, our lever as I've been saying for a while is the FLDS decision to use tax dollars even more directly (beside tax breaks) to fund their lifestyle. Those young girls/women that have babies with the men sleeping with a lot of women are saying they are single mothers and getting welfare money, which includes federal money. We're paying for it folks. That's an issue and a handle anyone, even in the GOP, can appreciate. Please write your representatives in Congress.
Thanks to FrenchDoc for this and many thanks to Sarah for her long work on this. (Do read her blog too.)
Mormons in the Senate
Republicans Mike Crapo of Idaho and Gordon Smith of Oregon are also Mormons. If that's relevant.