On "progressive" demands for "patience" with Obama

promote a "tool option," which is a concept for providing an unspecified number of unspecified tools to potentially save an unspecified number (but probably ~2%) of babies.

Richard Grossman says:

*********************
[20:05] The problem is not when corporations break the law because we have laws to deal with that, I'm much more concerned with what corporations do; what the people running corporations do that is considered legal; considered legal by the law and considered legal by the lore...the culture. When corporations deny Constitutional rights for their employees -- that is legal by the law and the lore. When corporations pour their billions of dollars to bastardize the electoral process and the legislative process, when corporations lobby -- that's legal.

When corporations write the telecommunications act of 1996 -- that's legal. Most the harms; the rights denials and assaults of corporations are legal. When the DuPont corporation spews x thousands of pounds or thousands of tons of known deadly chemicals into the air and the water everyday and their vice-president gets up there and says, "we have a permit for this" from the state of Delaware, or the state of Michigan, or the state of Washington -- it's legal.

You go and look and look in your state corporate code: corporations shall have the rights of persons. So, when they, in fact, sit on your zoning boards and sit in on your planning boards, and when they sue to nullify [a] law because it denies their equal protection [under the] law, or due process [under the] law, or First Amendment free speech rights -- it's legal.
*****************

Richard Grossman continues:

*****************
When the Pennsylvania legislature passes a law banning advertising of tobacco products within a hundred feet of a school.... And the American Tobacco Company and the Lorelei Company go to federal court and sue, saying this violates our corporations' First Amendment rights under the United States Constitution rights and the Supreme Court rules nine to zero in their favor and those billboards go up next to the school -- it's legal.

...If we made a list here of the laws the [federal courts and the] Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional because of a suits brought by a human person claiming that that law violated some human right found in the Constitution and we compare that list with -- to the local, state, and federal laws passed from the beginning of this country that were declared unconstitutional by [federal courts and] the Supreme Court out of suits brought by corporations saying those laws denied them their Constitutional rights that list would a thousand to one [longer than the list of the courts finding in favor of suits brought on behalf of human rights.]

...Most of the violations to human rights and the harms that corporations are causing in this country today are considered by the law as legal and are considered by the lore, the culture, as essential for the American way of life, as essential for jobs, as essential for liberty, as essential for security, as essential for progress. How many times have you heard, oh if you pass this health law or this environmental law it'll throw people out of work, it will destroy the economy? And how many elected officials around the country do we have that don't believe that?

We're trying all the time to persuade and convince elected officials who believe that [corporations are] the essence of the source of the jobs and progress and wealth and goodness and security [that we have] in this country. And that the [root] of that is the production of endless more...and anything that interferes with the production of endless more -- with fewer and fewer people making the endless more, of course -- is a menace, is a traitor to the American way of life.

page not found comes up....