Read Slowly and Carefully

Please read Paul Jorian's blogpost regarding the implosion of the credit markets, the reasons, the influence of "The Chicago School" of economists whose assumptions continue to help us not understand how economies work, and "What it All Means".

Don't feel bad to reread each sentence, mouth-moving to form the words, just as I must do. Just read it. (plus it's fucking footnoted. My god, who footnotes a blog!!!????)

Here are some teasers:

The opener:

Finance is in shambles. It has remained until now under the close supervision of economic and financial theory. In recent years, due to the overbearing dominance of views developed under the umbrella of the “Chicago School” of economics, finance has been regarded as explainable through the combination of a very simplified version of psychology: that of the “homo oeconomicus“, and of physics.

An example of the difference between theoretical economics based on "people as particles" and describing the behavior of people as more complex.

Here an example: price formation which economists explain as the meeting of a curve representing demand with another representing supply. Now tell me: has any anthropologist ever encountered circumstances where the status of buyer and seller is indifferent to the settling of price?

A clear description:

Briefly said, Asset-Backed Securities are debt instruments created by pooling several thousands of consumer loans in the likeness of a traditional bond. ABS may be backed by credit card debt, mortgages, student loans, aircraft leases, and so on. Literally speaking, Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) are asset-backed securities; historically though, MBS refer only to securities backed by “prime” mortgages, the less risky ones with high level of collateral (low Loan To Value)
and high borrower credit score (3).

And explanation (personal experience) of what happened to those "instruments" by their nature:

Models used to represent ABS’ behaviour were known to be inadequate, being in particular deprived of tools allowing simulating the impact of “triggers”, triggers being a setup allowing when the instrument is distressed to divert cash flows to locations where they are more urgently needed. Models used back in 2007 at Countrywide, the top institution in the United States granting mortgages, ergo the top institution of that type in the world at large, were deprived of the capacity of simulating “triggers”. This was not regarded though as an issue to be taken in earnest as Countrywide’s accounting advisor - backed in this by the United States government regulator of thrifts, the OTS - regarded that lack of understanding of the products sold to trusting patrons as “industry standard,” i.e. all right. My own insistence, in my capacity of “model validator” within the Risk Management team, that such “triggers” be added to our models explains no doubt why I belonged to the first load of Countrywide employees allowed to join back the job market in October 2007. Here was at work one well-advertised dimension of the subprime crisis: the sales by investment bankers of financial products whereof they had very little understanding.

Emphasis mine.

Oh, and good, snarky writing:

Financial engineers with mathematical degrees from reputable higher education institutions will tell you that the current forward rate for a three year loan taken in nine months is a very good forecast for what the three year interest rate will be in nine months. It doesn’t make any mathematical or any other sense. But mind you, the fate of whole Wall Street or City institutions has been built on that basis.

What’s the explanation? My own hypothesis is that that belief derives from a special combination of arithmetic and optimism. I was once expounding to the late Professor Meyer Fortes my dismay that some of the sayings of fishermen I had lived with in Brittany seemed to be very reliable and based on empirical observation while others added to nothing more than superstition. A smile came upon his face, betraying his unswerving trust in human nature: “Paul, what would we be without hope?”

Much more important stuff there.

Go. Read. All. Please.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Greed is noticeably absent

Yup. Surprising that it is not.

it's not hard to figure out the roots of this crisis/"crisis"

deregulation. deliberate misrepresentation of value. shoddy lending discipline. predatory lending. a closed system of people in a culture unwilling to speak truth to itself. lemming-like willful collective ignorance. propaganda.

the banks stopped lending to each other because the jig was up, and they no longer trusted each other. then lehman went down, and they all had a few days of fear that oh noes!! the gov't isn't going to make the taxpayers pay for our mistakes. but that was a groundless fear. and now, it's very clear that any superlarge, superwealthy institution or concern can join in on the fun. "we'll shut down this strategically vital sector of your economy if you don't use taxpayer dollar to buy up fake paper at inflated values, and then sell them back to us at pennies on the dollar so we can retain control over those elements that do have value!"

that's really the jist of it, afaic. i fully expect every large corporate entity and foreign lender that is exposed to deflation of assets by holding too much fake "financial instrument" paper to get in line. i fully expect dems, no matter how large their majority, to continue to hand out the free money. nice low federal interest rates make the whole thing even sweeter for banks; they're essentially getting money at no cost, making money they get to keep with it, and relieved of the burdens of actually cleaning up their own messes and redefining their business practices to reflect more reality-based values and markets. and our gov't, and others, will go along, printing money all day long, never mind what inflationary or destablizing effects this has on the currency, or non-superrich individual.

So, we really ought to become a bank

Just one that's free of usury.

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

Another description for hope

And used by Nick Paumgarten's The New Yorker piece, "Wiz Bucks": magical thinking.

'a special combination of arithmetic and optimism'

that line is a keeper. thanks for finding that blog, entertaining and informative both.