The Times eats the latest administration Iran story with a spoon.
Why, after the Downing Street Memo showed how "the intelligence and facts were fixed around the policy" when the administration faked the case for war with Iraq, would I ever believe a single "fact" or item of intelligence when the administration tries to make the case for war with Iran?
And why, after the Times, in the person of Judy "Kneepads" Miller, helped the administration fake the case for war with Iraq, would I ever believe they're anything more than stenographers helping the administration make the case for war with Iran?
NOTE More on fixing the facts here, from Tyler Drumheller.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Front page
Comments
they're quite a bit more in fact
At least one of their Directors is a member of the Carlyle Group, and as such stands to make more than a little money if the D.o'D.'s budget is inflated even more by an expanded war.
This shill also headed the FCC during the Clinton administration.
Funny how much of the main$tream media started to wear brown shirts about that time, isn't it?
Regarding the IEDs: funny how everyone forgets the weapons caches Rumsfeld let the locals walk away with about the time he was consolidating his hold on the oil wells.
You can find out more about Al Qaqaa, what it was, and why it and other sites like it would have supplied all the C4 and other conventional explosives an insurrection would ever need here and here and here and here and here.
Al Qaqaa had over 380 tons of explosives. The locals made off with it completely.
That's enough to blow up every road in Iraq, one American personnel carrier at a time.
And of course, despite being videotaped, Bu$hCo claims that never happened. Who ya gonna believe, Dear Leader or yer lyin' eyes?
No Hell below us
Above us, only sky
i really wish i could convince
all of my creditors that i was a multimillionaire. i mean, if only they were as ready to believe flimsy evidence, manipulated bank statements, creditworthiness based on the assertions of proven liars...for some reason, they just aren't as gullible as our famously fact-free press.