Reich: The real scandal is that AIG is accountable to nobody

lambert's picture

Robert Reich:

But if our very own Secretary of the Treasury doesn't even learn of the bonuses until months after AIG has decided to pay them, and cannot make stick his decision that they should not be paid, AIG is not even accountable to the government. That means AIG's executives -- using $170 billion of our money, so far -- are accountable to no one.

Oh, and Larry the Bailout Guy's argument that we are somehow being "forced" to pay the bonuses because of prior contractual agreements is -- and I know this will surprise you -- deeply bogus:

AIG's arguments are absurd on their face. Had AIG gone into chapter 11 bankruptcy or been liquidated, as it would have without government aid, no bonuses would ever be paid (they would have had a lower priority under bankruptcy law that AIG's debts to other creditors); indeed, AIG's executives would have long ago been on the street. And any mention of the word "talent" in the same sentence as "AIG" or "credit default swaps" would be laughable if laughing weren't already so expensive.

It's starting to look to me like Larissa Alexandrovna is right:

The role of government in the modern era has become rather clear to me: it acts as a broker for the transfer of public money to private hands.* There is no actual governing.

Sure looks like that's what's going on here.

If you liked this post, buy the author some books.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Imelda Blahnik's picture

Obama's political capital

is being squandered, fast.

gqmartinez's picture

Capital priorities

Maybe this *is* what Obama wants to spend his political capital on. Its becoming increasingly clear he doesn't want to "waste" it on single payer health care (or even health care that would get us to single payer in the not too distant future): he want to increase "access" not coverage from what I can tell.

Of course there is the possibility of some 11 dimensional chess game that he is playing and only he knows about. (Can we start calling that the "Gnostic Obama"?) But as far as I'm concerned, its looking more like this is a feature, not a bug of the Obama administration.

Only tyrants rig elections.

Davidson's picture

Greenwald reminds us of auto workers' contracts

AP article highlighted in Greenwald's piece today (emphasis mine):

The United Auto Workers’ deal with Detroit’s three automakers limits overtime, changes work rules, cuts lump-sum cash bonuses and gets rid of cost-of-living pay raises to help reduce the companies’ labor costs, people briefed on the agreement said today.

The UAW announced Tuesday that it reached the tentative agreement with General Motors Corp., Chrysler LLC and Ford Motor Co. over contract concessions, as GM and Chrysler sent plans to the Treasury Department asking for a total of $39 billion in government financing to help them survive.

Concessions with the union are a condition of the $17.4 billion in government loans that the automakers have received so far.

pie's picture

Hey, everybody gets it,

including Josh:

As noted previously, the scale and nature of a lot of the losses at AIGFP go well beyond reckless and folly. A lot of it looks like fraud. And go-go operations like AIGFP don't tend to fair too well in general when subjected to searching legal scrutiny. The government should be making it clear that criminal investigators are reviewing the entire matter. Contracts don't easily withstand credible allegations of illegal behavior. And the executives in question need to have their attention focused on the calculus of levels of cooperation and legal vulnerability rather than compensation packages.

The Obama administration isn't going to get away with "We can't make them do it." I don't know why they're doing this little dance, but they'd better not screw this up. Obama's credibility, even with his diehard supporters, is on the line, and this cuts across the entire political spectrum.

Mandos's picture

emptywheel

Marcy Wheeler has a potential explanation:

I take this to mean that if a bunch of AIGFP managers quit because they didn't receive bonuses promised in their contracts, then France could, if it wanted, to appoint its own designee. And if that happened, then it would equate to a default and those contracts would kick in, at a cost to AIG the US government of at least tens of billions.

In other words, I take this to be a threat: "if you don't give us our bonuses, we'll trigger a default event that will cost AIG the US government tens of billions of dollars." It's just a polite way of saying, "Pay us the $100 million ransom or we start exploding the suicide bomber vests we're wearing."

BDBlue's picture

But Couldn't The US Just Walk Away

from any agreement where the counterparty triggered the default and demanded payment. It's not like the US Government has a legal obligation to pay these debts. They're simply bailing AIG out. The US could decide not to bail AIG out and then France or whoever is fucked. So it seems to me it's a bluff that's meaningless.

"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt

Mandos's picture

I'm assuming...

...that in a world where the US government is borrowing money for a stimulus package, screwing over foreign economies may not be such a great idea.

I suggest the real solution is to pass a massive tax on bonuses, and then make it a criminal offense to be found storing money in the Cayman islands. This kind of thing has probably been the solution to a lot of problems for a long time, but you should not expect to see it any time soon.

Help the hamsters with their winter heating bill ...

… as they power the wheels that turn the servers at The Mighty Corrente Building. Please, won’t you help them keep their cages shiny?

No PayPal Account required! Give the hamsters immediate relief!

Or Subscribe to make a monthly payment!

Corrente is completely supported by contributions from readers. Thank you!

Download Citibank Plutonomy files

Part 1 [PDF]

Part 2 [PDF]

Good reading! Favorite quote: What could go wrong?
Beyond war, inflation, the end of the technology/productivity wave, and financial collapse, we think the most potent and short-term threat would be societies demanding a more ‘equitable’ share of wealth.

The 12 Word Platform

1. Medicare for All

2. End the Wars

3. Tax the Rich

4. A Jobs Guarantee

Senior fellows of The Mighty Corrente Building

Leah (CA), Lambert (PA/ME), RDF (??), BDBlue (DC), Hipparchia (FL), MsExPat (NY), letsgetitdone (DC), twig (LA), Tony Wikrent, (NC), jawbone (PA).

Corresponding fellows

danps.

Western Coordinator

coyotecreek

Correspondents

Health care reform: DCBlogger.

Fellows emeritus

mjs, Riggsveda, Tresy, Tom, hekebolos, chicagodyke, shystee, and Xenophon, Vastleft (MA), Sarah (TX).

Random term

Obama Fan Base. Usage example: The OFB were out in force in that thread!

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Americans United is dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.