They're holding Sibelius up, and confirming her is going to require 60 votes (translation: Filibuster, except it's not a filibuster when Republicans do it, and we have a free press, and up is down). Anyhow, what Reid should do is let 'em filibuster. But the old-fashioned way
Where they have bring in matresses to sleep on the Senate Floor and read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire into the record for sixty hours. When your enemy's drowning, throw 'em an anvil.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[encrypted]+#b94+
Printer-friendly version


Front page


Comments
Lambert, I posted some stuff over at TL
regarding the Sebelius matter. This could be a nasty one, as the background confirms:
I always believed Sebelius was going to be problematic all along. Kansas (and specifically Wichita) has become sort of a battleground for anti-choice folks. And most of the controversy surrounds a doctor in Wichita (Dr. Tiller) who performs late term abortions (and I do mean late term). In fact, he is one of only several in the country that do and therefore he attracts considerable patients from all over the country. In fact, more non-state residents receive abortions in the state than residents (see below). Dr. Tiller was recently acquitted of grand jury indictments for allegedly violating Kansas abortion statutes. Sebelius today vetoed amendments to the law that would have virtually shut down Dr. Tiller.
Governor Sebelius brought a lot of this on herself when she misstated campaign contributions she had received from a doctor closely associated with Dr. Tiller -- in fact the sole doctor Tiller uses to corroborate a late term abortion, as required by Kansas law. Kansas changed the abortion statute in the late 90s, requiring an additional diagnosis from a Kansas doctor. The entire intent of the amendment was to shut down late term abortions. Dr. Tiller found only one doctor in the state that would work with him. That doctor contributed to Governor Sibelius campaign fund.
Put simply, the fanatical anti-choice folks have undoubtedly drawn a line in the sand on this one. They are pissed over Tiller, they are pissed over his acquittal, they are pissed over Sibelius and now, pissed about the veto. I'm convinced they're calling in all the markers on this one.
At one time Obama was purportedly considering Sibelius as his running mate. I believe that all this baggage helped doom her for that slot. Here's a little snippet:
Sorry for the length of this post. But I thought this background be an interesting read.
thanks for posting it
i knew most of this already, but hadn't seen it yet all in one article.
If they're drawing a line in the sand
good.
Most people disagree with them.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
Operation Rescue has labeled her "America's Abortion Queen"
I might suggest an all out counter offensive from those that support Governor Sebelius' nomination. Because the opposition is not sitting still on this one:
Continued at this Link
the decline and fall of the roman empire?
can we force them to read it from teleprompters? and then maybe we could arrange to accidentally on purpose get the texts mixed up so that they end up reading something else instead?
Also, force them to read "Collapse" ...
... by Jared Diamond, about the failure of civilizations that stuck to ideology instead of adapting to their environment.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collapse_(book)
Yes, REAL Filibusters!
It seems to me that as long as the Senate Repugs can say "You don't have 60 votes." and Harry Reid says "OK, lets go on to the next thing.", as long as that is the consequence, 59 Democrats are stuck going nowhere. They need to pick their fights well, so the Repugs get no good sound bites and will just show up as obstructionists, and then say "Let's have that filibuster!"