
The reaction at The Obama 527 Formerly Known as Daily Kos (427 recs):
BWHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
And then, there's the adult view:
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.Crap
I hope this works out better than I expect, but 60 nominal Ds doesn't equal 60 votes. Specter's still free to be a dick in the Senate, and I expect the state Dem party to welcome him with open arms and push all challengers away from the primary. Though it does open the door for a non-insider candidate to run and perhaps have a more realistic chance than they would have otherwise.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page




Comments
The bright side
I might not have to suffer the spectacle of Chris Matthews taking the nomination for that seat.
We will push and push and push until some larger force makes us stop.
I am not sure
but Tweety might be looking better compared Specter.
I'm sooo overdue to post a new issue of Arlen Magazine
Sounds like Specter's gonna fit right in!
Good one.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
"10 principled stands I nearly took"
Bwahahaha!
More seriously, how does he stack up against Blue Dogs and/or some of the Southern Democrats?
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...
Perfect
It couldn't be said better, vastleft. I was (badly) trying to explain to my husband last night why this wouldn't necessarily be the good thing. I think I'll show him your magazine cover instead.
Glenn's post should be quite handy in that regard, too
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2...
Memories: Clarence Thomas hearing and R's attacks on Anita Hill-
with very little defense from Dems. Arlen Specter was the prosecutorial attack dog; Alan Simpson received information "over the transom"; and Orrin Hatch was the clean up hatchet man who also read passages from The Exorcist to denigrate Anita Hill's testimony.
From the NYTimes coverage:
Specter badgered Hill with specious claims that she had committed perjury and should be prosecuted. Coverage of this part of the nomination hearing entrenched "he said/she said" in MCM coverage, altho Time used "She Said, He Said."
God, it was so ugly. It was sickening. Those three senators still give me the creeps.
How many here recall watching those hearings? And how angry did it make you? I recall heated conversations about sexual harrassment at work and lots of men --and women-- who still "didn't get it."
The Dem senators were no knights in shining armor and it was said Teddy Kennedy was stymied in any defense bcz of Chappaquidddick.
Joe Biden Chaired That Hearing
IIRC. Just as he chaired the hearing on the lead up to the Iraq vote. I was happy to see him nominated for VP if only to get him out of the Senate.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
DINO Specter
Specter made no secret that he would be a Democrat in name only - so it's almost certainly a net negative if he continues to represent Pennsylvania instead of being knocked off by Toomey and giving a real Democrat a very good chance to represent what is now a Blue state in 2010. For the rest of this year, maybe there's a few positive bits. That is why I thought Sestak's response last night on the Ed Show was so good. He said that the Democratic Villagers opposed his candidacy for the House, and may do so if he decides to run for the Senate. He didn't care then and he won't care what they have promised Specter if he thinks he can do more good occupying the seat Specter currently holds. What's not to like about that?
Sestak
I would be happy if he decided to run. There needs to be a challenge to the current GOP-Dem corrupt power structure.
The question is: If a more liberal candidate throws their hat in the Dem Senate primary will the OFB
support Specter or the more liberal candidate? That would be the true test of what Obama and the OFB are all about, challenging Specter from the left.
Only tyrants rig elections.
Test Failed
According to Joe Cannon, at Cannofire there is only one post at Daily Kos about the fax campaign, and it's written by our very own hipparchia.
Single Payer is something anyone who calls hirself a liberal can get behind. But they aren't pushing it.
And that speaks volumes about their agenda, which is about Obama, not the American people.
He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond
There's time
We have about a year before declarations have to be made and sides need to be taken regarding Specter's next campaign. I understand Sestak raised about half a million dollars in preparation for the run already (I'm a little foggy about what the period over which he raised that much was). While it's seed money size, it will be enough to finance the planning and organizing that precedes an announcement. So, he gets to prepare and watch, and raise a little more. If Specter does what he says he will do, there should be plenty of room and plenty of support for a run challenging Specter from the left. Especially if Specter not only opposes the Employee Free Choice Act but votes against cloture, union support for him will be tepid at best. Wait and see. Not being from Pennsylvania, all I get to do is cheer and maybe contribute a little (very little unless something fairly spectacular happens).