Stack overflow
Primary tabs
[I'm leaving this sticky so we can watch the mainstream narrative coagulate. See the final UPDATE for a quick blogosphere roundup. --lambert]
Via McClatchy's Fort Worth Star Telegram...
In a rambling, obscenity-laced suicide note posted online, the pilot accused of flying his plane into an Austin office building Thursday takes aim at the IRS, religion, big business and even [??] former President George W. Bush.
“I remember reading about the stock market crash before the ‘great’ depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything,” according to the posting, dated Feb. 18, 2010, and signed “Joe Stack, (1956-2010)."
How is that "rambling"? It's all true.
+1000:
“Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s ‘business-as-usual.’
“Now when the wealthy f--- up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.”
How is that "rambling"? It's all true.
-1000:
Violence, he wrote, "not only is the answer, it is the only answer."
Not to any question I want to ask.... I think NV is the only answer.*
NOTE Why in the name of sweet suffering Jeebus did Joseph Andrew Stack (Piper PA-28-236) identify the IRS as the real enemy? It's the banksters who lack the shame and the stones to self-defenestrate who are the real enemies. Why blame the collection agency, instead of the bank? That's the fundamental sloppiness of the right wing critique at work.
NOTE * In fact, I'm not really willing to entertain discussion on this point; I might even add that policy to the administrivia page.
CLARIFICATION "It's all true" applies only to the quoted material. Obviously, since I call out "the fundamental sloppiness of the right wing critique," and mark the writer -1000 for lack of NV, I don't believe the whole letter is true.
UPDATE Here is a great, great post at Yves place, and read the comments before the press and the access bloggers totally pollute the story.
UPDATE It's all about the rents! Here's an analysis of section 1706, which is the section of the Tax Code Stack writes about in his letter (this happened to me, and no, the impact wasn't good):
Because when the IRS changed the code, it destroyed thousands of engineering independent contractors status. In the past, an individual could act easily as a small business, complete with all taxes and deductions allowed to a small business and take on projects directly with large companies, working in house, using their engineering workplace. ...
That independent consultant, engineer, was charging lawyer rates, $100-$600 an hour, and the firm, corporation contracted with that individual directly.
Corporations would pay those rates and still do, for they needed that level of expertise, but unfortunately, again to the Sec. 1706, the engineer no longer is getting that money, instead a 3rd party contract house is, like a glorified slave trader.
Even worse, corporations will only use certain contract houses and it's not based on skills, expertise, ability, it's all based on some inside contract arrangement and preferred vendor status. Get it? Now trading people is considered to be a vendor. One is just a body and individuals with their technical expertise are traded like sacks of corn and potatoes.
In 1987 when Sec. 1706 passed, corporations ran scared and instead used a host of 3rd party vendors, as IRS buffers, who turn around and take 20% to 80% of that contractor's gross receipts, paid out as 1099-misc. [rent!] That 3rd party does nothing but act as an IRS buffer so a corporation will not be held liable if that independent consultant is deemed to be an employee of that firm.
Engineers and specialty skilled consultants are not the same as other types of contractors or even programmers. Often a firm needs this expertise, but per project, often lasting at least 1 year to 5, but they do not need these specialty skills longer than that because the project is then over.
So, what the IRS did was screw over thousands of highly skilled independent consultants and made 3rd party contract houses, like Manpower, Kelly Services, etc. proliferate and in fact these contract houses plain steal from the consultants pocket and offer nothing except a legal buffering for a corporation to avoid paying FICA and other taxes.
UPDATE Stack's sin? (And I use the word sin advisedly.) Crashing his plane into the building during business hours (though, I suppose one would always have peasants -- cleaning people -- to look out for). Meanwhile, conventional wisdom is coagulating among the access bloggers ("bizarre ideology").
When I read Stack's missive, I see unformed ideology that's no more or less bizarre than, say our elite's "market based solutions" that murder 45,000 people a year, and which our access bloggers and "progressives" at best seek to palliate. And I also see experience that's like mine and like millions:
My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.
In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.
I guess they didn't have ramen noodles available then. As Yves remarks:
I met with a pollster yesterday, and he said he had never seen such a gap in attitudes in beliefs among those in the political elite versus those of the public at large, and he expected bad outcomes.
"Progressives" suck just as hard as the rest of the elite. We already know that from the health insurance reform fiasco, but we can learn it all over again from the Stack episode. Why? Because Stack's experience, as distinct from his action, is shared by millions. Even though "progressives" are the trivial and abortive power seekers we know them to be, if they had an ounce of political courage or even a smidgeon of good sense, they'd be trying to fix the problem and win an electorate of millions for generations (like, say, FDR).
So what do we get? "Bizarre ideology." Horse-race coverage. More horse race coverage. He's wearing the wrong jersey! It is so terrorism, so FOX sucks! Stack's insane and a tax nut. The only exception I can find is Greenwald, who calls this shot:
[I]f Stack's manifesto begins to attract serious attention, I think it's likely the term Terrorist will be decisively applied to him in order to discredit what he wrote. His message is a sharply anti-establishment and populist grievance of the type that transcends ideological and partisan divisions -- the complaints which Stack passionately voices are found as common threads in the tea party movement and among citizens on both the Left and on the Right -- and thus tend to be the type which the establishment (which benefits from high levels of partisan distractions and divisions) finds most threatening and in need of demonization. Nothing is more effective at demonizing something than slapping the Terrorist label onto it.
As you can see from the links I gave, that's already happening. And who's leading the charge? Why, "progressives" -- to stick the needle into FOX! [pounds head on desk]. Stupid, stupid, stupid. Oh well, I'm sure that plays well in Versailles.
Who was it who said that evil is absence of empathy?
Killing by crashing a plane into a building is evil, for that very reason.
Killing by crashing trillions of toxic derivatives into the economy is evil, and for the same reason -- and it kills a lot more people.
Oddly, or not, that's not the focus of "progressive" discourse right now.

- lambert's blog


- Log in or register to post comments
Comments
Hmm...
A man with an axe to grind with the government flies an airplane into a building containing government offices, and this is the response:
Why don't they come out and say, "there is no reason to believe that Muslims were involved"?
Speaking of...
How about this from Joe Biden yesterday:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/02/1...
"Biden Fears Terror Hit by Individual"
That screed has since been taken down...
...but I read it through while it was still up. This slime thought that the IRS is the enemy because they wouldn't give him--the little guy--a pass on certain tax regulations that he thought the big boys were getting. I don't know whether he's right about that, but this awful stunt today was essentially a tantrum over getting caught cheating and having to pay a price for it. His motives were almost as despicable as his actions.
Except when all the big guys are cheating...
... what's wrong with the little guy doing it?
Not saying cheating's not wrong, but you can see how the rot spreads. And it's not the little guys that tore up the social contract, or slammed the gates to their communities shut. So, I don't agree, but I do understand.
His note is here
among other places:
http://blog.seattlepi.com/hottopics/arch...
Full text is towards the bottom.
Well, I'm totally sure that what's happened to him...
... is totally exceptional. I mean, who else has been through two gigantic crashes in less than ten years? Oh, wait...
My favorites are the comments
on every site reporting this story.. all containing variations on 'whiner' or 'he needed to get laid'.
Seriously, am I getting old or has the snottiness quotient out there really just shot off the horizon?
I mean for crying out loud.
[shoot]
whered the delete button go
I don't understand people who
personalize their battle with the IRS, when the IRS is the final word. I just don't get that. I understand going to war with a tax code that outright damages your ability to earn a real living, but I don't understand doing it in such a way that you wind up footing the bill personally and directly. Unless you're going to battle intending to do just that.
I'm sympathetic to the guy on a lot of fronts, but this "cleverness" in thinking that you can manipulate your tax bill just because some yahoo points to a sub-section and tells you that you can do it (and I'm sure the man in question would tell me that they were thoroughly well-acquainted with the code and that the practice employed by the IRS was at odds with the written word - which may be true).
Still, he has legitimate beefs but the IRS was not the problem that he had.
The whole thing
Susie published it, and she's right.
* * *
Well, let's see, Lambert:
the thing reads like a cross between the Cliff's Notes for a Russian novel, and a "I'm a good God-fearing White Christian Republican. Where's MY tax cut?"
You can claim it's all true if you want, but this guy is no more a hero than was the guy who shot John Lennon or the guy who shot Dr. Tiller.
Of course I'm prejudiced. I live in Texas. I used to work for the Department of State Health Services. They used to have an office in that same damn building.
This guy was just as much a suicide bomber as Abdullamatab wanted to be. He just drove the bomb himself.
Well, since I mark the guy -1000 for lack of NV...
... I'm not sure why you think I regard him as a hero. Ghandi and MLK were heroes.
Let's not make the mistake of thinking that
just because we read a 6-page suicide note that we could ever come close to understanding the totality of this guy's life; I would venture to guess that not even the person who is preparing to end his own life could adequately explain himself if he had written 600 pages - that's what therapy is for!
Regardless of whether one thinks of this man as a terrorist or a garden-vareity nutcase with a need to make headlines, or someone far more complex, the truth is that within that six pages was an expression that no doubt resonated with a lot of people: the part about how us little people are just fodder for the giant soul- and money-sucking maw that this corporate-controlled country has become. Billions for banksters, bonuses to reward the people who got us into this mess; trillions for war, but nothing for health care or jobs.
I'm sorry this man did not get the help he so obviously needed, and I pray that others who are no doubt standing on their own mental and financial precipice will not follow his example.
Maybe there's something wrong with me that I feel more compassion for this man's mental anguish than I do contempt for whatever he thought he could or could not "get away with" during his life. I certainly don't condone that he endangered the lives of many, and ended up killing one.
No one can ever be known or completely understood by a six-page letter, so let's stop thinking it contains all the answers.
"How did I get here?"
That being the question from Stack's letter.
And you may find yourself living in a shotgun shack
And you may find yourself in another part of the world
And you may find yourself behind the wheel of a large automobile
And you may find yourself in a beautiful house, with a beautiful wife
And you may ask yourself
Well...How did I get here?
Letting the days go by/let the water hold me down
Letting the days go by/water flowing underground
Into the blue again/after the money's gone
Once in a lifetime/water flowing underground.
And you may ask yourself
How do I work this?
And you may ask yourself
Where is that large automobile?
And you may tell yourself
This is not my beautiful house!
And you may tell yourself
This is not my beautiful wife!
Letting the days go by/let the water hold me down
Letting the days go by/water flowing underground
Into the blue again/after the money's gone
Once in a lifetime/water flowing underground.
Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...
Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...
Same as it ever was...Same as it ever was...
I'm on another forum with a woman whose husband works in
that building. Whose office was the one hit, and who lost a friend there. She had had him take the day off to help her, or he would be dead.
So, we're discussing the terra/not terra aspects, and the valid, if few, points in his screed, and the horror of what happened, and racism & assumptions.... we got no answers either, but I'm glad my friend's husband is alive.
That's why NV is good...
... because of what, if this were one of our imperial wars, we would call "collateral damage."
okay, I give up
I thought I would eventually figure out what "NV" means, by reading in context. But, no.
I guess I haven't been around Corrente long enough, or don't spend enough time on the internette.
So, I'm asking... ?
Non-Violence, I believe
My best guess, anyway!
Thanks Anne
That makes sense.
I guess I was stuck in the " not voting" mind loop, and couldn't transition from that.
April fifteenth is coming.
There are a lot of workers that were laid off last year that will receive most tax withheld from their pay in refunds.
I wonder what the number of jobless people there are who will owe taxes on April 15th and have no way to pay. There are going to be a lot of really pissed off people out there.
If I worked for the IRS, I'd start looking for another job as fast as possible.