That’s the bottom line. But we’re going to have to hack through thickets of obfuscation to get there. Work with me here:
Today, the VRWC
needs to protect The Non-Answerer from truthteller Jim Comey. And Fred Hiatt comes through right on cue.
You remember Pepperdine, right? The school that tried to hire Ken Starr, even though he hadn’t finished burning through $20 million investigating a blow job as part of the VRWC’s failed attempt to bring Clinton down? Well, Fred Hiatt has turned over the Op-Ed pages to Pepperdine’s Christianist and Federalist Society operative Douglas W. Kmiec. And Doug—I hope I may call him Doug—really sits up and works:
James Comey’s Senate testimony on Tuesday was staggeringly histrionic. It has, as Sen. Arlen Specter suggested, the dramatic flair of the Saturday Night Massacre. Presidential emissaries seeking the signature of a critically ill man only to be headed off at the hospital room door by a Jimmy Stewart-like hero defending the law over the pursuit of power. Frank Capra, call your office.
There are several problems with this scene. First, the comparison to Watergate is wholly inapt.
Notice the inartful pivot in the word “scene.” Doug’s lead implies that the “scene” is at the hospital, but, with the word “Watergate,” he reveals that the “scene” he really has in mind is in the Committee room. So, the “histrionics” don’t apply to the grotesque “scene” of Gonzo and Card trying to force a sedated, suffering, post-operative patient flat on his back in a hospital bed to sign off on a program he’s refused to sign off on when well—and what that says about Gonzo, Card, and the man they service—or to Comey rushing to the room to prevent them from doing so, after a call from the sick man’s wife.
No, no. The “histrionics” have to do with—get this—“defending the law over the pursuit of power.” Well, good Rovian that he is, Doug goes straight for the enemy’s strength.** Here’s what he has to say:
Watergate involved a real crime — breaking and entering, with a phenomenally stupid coverup that also fit the definition of criminal obstruction. And the underlying motivation for Richard Nixon’s demise was raw politics. Comey’s tale lacks crime and this venal political intrigue.
“Comey’s tale lacks crime”?! Lacks “venal political intrigue”?!?! Doug, Doug—Little man, where have you been living? Read more











Front page
Recent comments
3 hours 46 sec ago
3 hours 2 min ago
3 hours 13 min ago
3 hours 37 min ago
4 hours 23 min ago
5 hours 30 min ago
5 hours 59 min ago
6 hours 5 min ago
6 hours 28 min ago
6 hours 57 min ago
7 hours 10 min ago
7 hours 33 min ago
7 hours 35 min ago
7 hours 37 min ago
7 hours 41 min ago
7 hours 56 min ago
7 hours 56 min ago
7 hours 56 min ago
8 hours 1 min ago
8 hours 24 min ago