Bush Court

Bush Court: We're not bound by precedent when there's "widespread agreement" among Chicago School economists

More evidence of why Scalia et al threw election 2000 to the Republicans in Bush v. Gore. They wanted the votes for decisions like this:

Justice Kennedy said Thursday that the court was not bound by the 1911 precedent because of the “widespread agreement” among economists that resale price maintenance agreements can promote competition.

And I bet you can guess the kind of economists they're listening to: