feminism
Submitted by jeqal on Sat, 2008-05-03 14:47.
I often wonder if it is my strict fundamentalist upbringing that allows me more skepticism when someone is trying to sell me swampland in Florida.
I have seen this comment before, I started this campaign pro-Hillary, I loved her since the Clinton era.
I knew that the attacks on her were on her because she was a moderate female. It is a rare thing to have a moderate “equalist” woman anywhere. The top 50 pundits had 7 women only one was a feminist and she was also a moderate.
I am tired of obama supporters, really tired of them.
I will not be blogging as much as I start back to the grind next week. Read more
Submitted by BDBlue on Fri, 2008-04-25 16:15.
Submitted by Paul_Lukasiak on Wed, 2008-04-16 13:25.
(caution: rant zone ahead)
Last night I finished up six days in Wonderland.
You see, last week I agreed to allow Part 4 of my “Sexism and Misogyny” series to be serialized at FDL. That was a mistake. Part 4 was really just one big fat footnote to the rest of the series, that explained a nice big chunk in the variance in the levels of evidence of sexism. The only reason it wasn’t a footnote is because it took too long to explain that while the variance was related to the percentage of black voters in the electorate, the cause of the variance was the “shift” in the white vote that occurs in conjunction with the increase in the percentage of the black vote.
Now, even my eyes glazed over while writing that last sentence, so I’m assuming that most of yours did too while reading it. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Tue, 2007-11-13 09:36.
Awards for blogs are generally silly things, and I don’t pay much attention to them. For the same reason as I don’t pay attention to online polling. I’m just a little too familiar with who is deeply invested (“you can vote once every 24hrs!”) in such things, who constructs them, and how they are used, to think them worthy of serious consideration. Anway, it warms my heart to find some purity left in the blogosphere, and I think the woman has a point. 49 categories, but not one specifically for da wimmin? That’s a head-scratcher.
Do you note the glaring omission of feminist blogs or a “Feminist Blogs” category? Pandagon, Feministing, and Shakesville were nominated under “Liberal Blogs” (and the winner was a white male liberal blogger, of course). There is a “GLBT” category which includes Pam’s House Blend (and the winner was Joe My God, a white gay male blogger, natch). Not only is a “feminist” category glaringly omitted, the nominees and winners are overwhelmingly white and male. Surprise.
Feminism, however, does not seem to exist in its own right for these guys. And, I guess, really, that’s about right. If a whole lot of people had their way — including many self-identified feminists– feminism would be subsumed, erased, hidden by these penultimately male categories, i.e., “liberal” and “GLBT”. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Mon, 2007-07-02 08:35.
So while I didn’t exactly keep up with blogs and politics while I was gone, I confess to reading a few sites now and again, as old habits die hard and working in the rain isn’t always fun. One site I’ve come to enjoy a great deal is Twisty’s “I Blame the Patriarchy.” She’s as hard core as they come on feminist issues, and hard core about keeping her blog free from those who don’t share her views. This may or may not be a good idea, but it surely has created one of the more rollicking places on the net for women to go and bitch about how Life Sucks for Teh Wimmin. Twisty calls it “advanced blaming” and never seems to have any problem finding topics upon which she and her community can comment.
Anyway, I got into a huge fight with a friend over this post, in which I found myself agreeing with Twisty’s perspective and that of most of the commenters. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2007-04-18 11:30.
People are really pissed about Skippy’s rhetorically charged post on VT and Kos and misogyny and violence against women. notice that I read the post as about all four of those things, and not just the first two. But there is one angle I’ll add: it’s a good thing that even when we strenuously disagree about framing, and the relationships between threats and murder and discourse, we are still talking about the basic problem: violence against women. This is the power of the blogosphere, and of blogging as a form of writing. Skippy could’ve put up a post with lots and lots of statistical details about the endemic of violence against women, and about four people would’ve read the whole thing. Instead, in one lightning strike, he’s continued an important discussion, made more important by Monday’s tragic events, and kept it on the front burner.
Kos is a big boy, he can take the critiques made of him, and his friends will come to his support. Discussion will happen, and hopefully, a few people will have their eyes opened to the relevant facts relating to violence against women. Kudos to Skippy for going against the grain, and kudos to the rest of the blogosphere, even his detractors, for keeping the conversation going. This is that rare time when a “blog war” actually serves a good cause. Republicans have made ’feminism’ a dirty word, and it’s long past time to take it back.
Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2007-04-18 10:05.
Submitted by chicago dyke on Thu, 2007-04-12 21:44.
My friend, and friend to women, Ian and I have been having an exchange on uberfeminism, the patriarchy, etc. It’s late for me, and I’ve got to run, but I think I have a partial answer to some of his questions. Warning: graphic photos ahead. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Tue, 2007-04-10 09:01.
If you’re a woman you need to read this blog. Every time I go there I am filled with emotion, hope and wonder, anger and despair…one of the writers is an ex-Quiverfull mom. The writing is extremely strong, and by that I mean that some men will be deeply offended by it. But instead, I would ask you men to read it like a straight woman would read the blog and comments of a particularly gratuitous porn-for-straight-men site.* Reading Heart and her commenting community is mind-expanding and eye-opening, to say the least. Today’s top stories about GLs and LGs put me in the Red Haze. Read more
Submitted by leah on Wed, 2007-03-21 13:35.

Please note the second installment is up of MJS’s photo essay on Sunday’s protest march in Hollywood; don’t miss it, or the first, and the comment thread it elicited. Molly would have approved; Molly would have been at one of them.
Technical difficulties of an, as yet, unknown origin kept me from posting, as promised here, our first installment of a new weekend series, featuring our attempt to bring to bear Molly Ivins’ words on the week to week reality we now face, tragically, without her actual presence in her midst. So much seemed to be happening the last two days, I decided not to post it. Still a lot going on, (grinning, she rubs her hands), but I decided to throw it into the mix anyway. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Sat, 2007-02-17 12:04.
My sister has an excellent rule, one that I don’t follow and I’m not going to follow here. She doesn’t start unfinished series, no matter how good. I think this one is worth it, even as I’m frustrated that the author is too busy with some other series to get back to this one soon. She says on her website that she will, so I hold out some hope, and recall that Jack Vance took 30-odd years to finish one of his series, but he did finish it.
If you like romance, sweeping epic storytelling, gender bending and intrigue, you’ll love these books. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Mon, 2007-01-08 13:35.
There are a lot of regular blogosphere “features” out there already, more than I can easily name. There’s the Daily Wanker , or best demonstration of what makes winger “logic” the joke it is. There’s the Five O’Clock NewsDump, when some embarrassing detail of Republican malfeasance is swept under the rug by our Famously Free Press. I now propose it’s time we bring back and Oldie but Goodie; one that has a special relevance in this new year.
Your Moment in Misogyny, brought to you by the ever relevant HuffPo:
As I watched Nancy Pelosi on Sunday morning, and I was stunned to discover that she and I both seem to have had the same haircut this week. It was a mistake for us both, in my opinion. How Nancy Pelosi had time to get her hair cut I don’t know, but I know how I did: I went to have my annual mammogram, and it was (as usual) so painful and horrible that I emerged completely deranged onto Madison Avenue, bought three pairs of shoes and wandered into my hairdresser’s, hoping she was free. She was, and as a result, my hair is too short. So is Nancy’s. Read more
|
Recent comments
9 min 48 sec ago
11 min 18 sec ago
14 min 19 sec ago
16 min 13 sec ago
28 min 48 sec ago
29 min 58 sec ago
32 min 35 sec ago
35 min 19 sec ago
42 min 2 sec ago
50 min 30 sec ago
52 min 2 sec ago
52 min 22 sec ago
59 min 47 sec ago
1 hour 5 min ago
1 hour 26 min ago
1 hour 41 min ago
1 hour 45 min ago
1 hour 49 min ago
1 hour 54 min ago
1 hour 57 min ago