Don't say "retroactive immunity." Say "total impunity"
Fred Hiatt cranks the bogosity knob up to 11. Please, somebody make it stop? My ears are bleeding:
There is one major area of disagreement between the administration and House Democrats where we think the administration has the better of the argument: the question of whether telecommunications companies that provided information to the government without court orders should be given retroactive immunity from being sued. House Democrats are understandably reluctant to grant that wholesale protection without understanding exactly what conduct they are shielding, and the administration has balked at providing such information. But the telecommunications providers seem to us to have been acting as patriotic corporate citizens in a difficult and uncharted environment.
Fred, it just seems that way to you because you're the Village
whore.
The Emerging Consensus on Iraq: Is There One, Or Only An Emerging Consensus That There Is? Part One

The Order of the Higher Weaselality
{Dirty Hippies and Lefty Bloggers Need Not Apply}
Does it really matter whether or not there is an actual emerging consensus about how to bring our adventure in Iraq to a less-than catastrophic conclusion as long as so many dues-paying members of that most exalted beltway Club of The Higher Weaselality insist there is one?
Find the correct answer below the fold:



Front page

Recent comments
13 min 20 sec ago
21 min 35 sec ago
31 min 20 sec ago
54 min 46 sec ago
1 hour 8 min ago
1 hour 8 min ago
1 hour 54 min ago
2 hours 5 min ago
2 hours 25 min ago
2 hours 25 min ago