I’ll just let Diane say it:
Last week I posted on FBI Director Robert Mueller’s attempt to defuse the impact of a pending Inspector General’s report on the agency’s improper use of “national security letters” to obtain records. He pointed out in testimony to Congress that the report covers a period before the FBI instituted reforms to stop the improprieties. Well, the report is now out, and I can see why Mr. Mueller made the effort. From an AP report published in today’s NY Times:
Top-level FBI counterterrorism executives issued improper blanket demands in 2006 for records of 3,860 telephone lines to justify the fact that agents already had obtained the data using an illegal procedure that is now prohibited, the Justice
Department inspector general reported Thursday.
Glenn A. Fine also reported that in one case FBI anti-terrorism agents circumvented a federal court which twice had refused a warrant for personal records because the judges believed the agents were investigating conduct protected by the First Amendment. Fine said the agents got the records using national security letters, which do not require a judge’s approval, without altering or re-examining the basis of their suspicions — the target’s association with others under investigation. [Emphasis added] Read more










Front page
Recent comments
5 min 20 sec ago
6 min 22 sec ago
9 min 46 sec ago
10 min 33 sec ago
16 min 40 sec ago
22 min 38 sec ago
23 min 12 sec ago
30 min 48 sec ago
32 min 55 sec ago
33 min ago
35 min 6 sec ago
41 min 3 sec ago
43 min 29 sec ago
1 hour 19 min ago
1 hour 26 min ago
1 hour 27 min ago
2 hours 34 min ago
2 hours 35 min ago
2 hours 35 min ago
2 hours 49 min ago