intelligence

Let's help Bush rewrite executive order 12333!

Executive Order 12333 is a Reagan [genuflects]-era order written to make sure the next Ollie North never gets prosecuted, to permit assassinations (in the jargon, “targeted killings”), and to permit domestic surveillance by the NSA.

One wonders what expanded powers Our Betters could possibly need. But need them they do, or so they tell us:

[Mike McConnell,] the national intelligence director, has won White House approval to begin revising an executive order that lays out each spy agency’s responsibilities and the government’s protections against spying on Americans.

Unlike the surveillance law, the White House can change an executive order without congressional or judicial approval.

I think it’s great that the administration is going to do this now, and I’m sure that the Regent [cough] lawyers down in the basement of Cheney’s bunker have already formed a prayer group on it. And I absolutely trust the Bush administration to do the right thing on this. Wouldn’t you?

[Reach me that bucket, wouldja hon?]

Some officials familiar with Intelligence Director Mike McConnell’s plans, speaking only on condition of anonymity because the deliberations remain internal, said his intent is solely to update the policy to reflect changes in the intelligence community since Sept. 11, 2001, including the creation of his own office.

But other officials, who also spoke on condition they not be identified, said opening the order to changes could lead well beyond that. They said the exercise could threaten civil liberties protections approved by President Reagan following intelligence abuses in the 1970s, and that intelligence agencies will be tempted to expand their powers.

In a recent interview, Vice Adm. Robert Murrett, director of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, characterized the effort as an “overhaul” aimed at helping all 16 spy agencies work more closely together. He said the discussions about the order — known by its number, 12333 — are still in the early stages.

McConnell himself has said the authorities of his office need to be adjusted. “We don’t have it right yet,” he told an audience in April.

Well, gosh. How about we good citizens help McConnell out? Here’s a copy of the order. And after careful, thoughtful, prayerful considerations, I’ve come up with the following changes to the Preamble:  Read more 

I'm sure that billions in secret, oversight-free intel contracts couldn't possibly be going to politically wired Republicans

I mean, that would just be science fiction stuff. Never happen. But hey, it could happen. And it would be irreponsible not to speculate (Hi, Nooners!):

Concerned about the growing dependence of the nation’s spy agencies on private contractors, top intelligence officials have spent months determining just how many contractors work at the C.I.A., D.I.A., F.B.I., N.S.A. and the rest of the spook alphabet soup.

Now they have an answer. But they cannot reveal it, they say, because America’s enemies might be listening.

And by “America’s enemies” they definitely mean “Democrats with subpoena power.”  Read more 

Army on Osama: We Give Up

I’m sure the folks in Yurp are glad this guy is going to be in charge of that tiny and unimportant organization called “NATO.”

 Read more 

Spy vs Spy

What the hell is going on here?

BEIJING, Dec. 13 (Xinhuanet) — The sudden disappearance of a number of key witnesses in the Alexander Litvinenko investigation will make it even harder for British detectives, whose inquiry has now spread across five countries, The Times reported Wednesday.  Read more 

Fully Automated, Continuously Operating, Intelligence Analysis Support System - Tangram

Don’t worry you’re covered. The Minority Report is here.
Seriously. I’d love to see old George Stephanopoulos (his name is in the spell check) ask a candidate – what is your position on the great grandson of CARNIVORE determining who gets rounded up? First carnivore, then TIA, now Tangram – the Air Force’s new strategic data mining program.  Read more 

GenderFuque

I’m on the road this week, forgive the light posting. But just to inflame some readers: what do you think? Are women smarter than men? Would you hate me if I said, “yes” most of the time? In all seriousness, I’ve never seen a poll unlike this one. For some reason, women seem to dislike war and pillage more than men. Why is that?

70 percent of women and 58 percent of men now oppose the war in Iraq.

That’s outside the moe. Tell me why you think this should be.

Get Chambliss Some Civil War Intelligence, Stat

I love it when people quote history, to make an entirely stupid point, and get the history entirely wrong, and then when asked about it by reporters, corrent correct themselves to make their point even wronger. Case in point: Saxby Chambliss, R-CSA

According to Roll Call’s source, [At a closed door meeting of the Armed Services Committee] Chambliss said, “We need better intelligence. If we had better intelligence in the Civil War we’d be quoting Jefferson Davis, not Lincoln.”

A spokesperson for Chambliss said the story wasn’t correct and that what the Senator actually said said was, “If Gen. JEB Stuart had had better intelligence, we’d all be meeting in Richmond right now.”  Read more 

Hookers Take Credit Cards

So when I read about stuff like this, all I want to do is laugh/cry at the idea that I’m supposed to be paranoid and afraid. Really, this is our money they’re spending, and when they’re not sifting through 50,000 of today’s phone calls about what to order on the pizza and how Aunt Millie’s corns are bothering her again, they’re off chasing cheap women in grungy brothels in Central America? I’m supposed to be impressed?

That said, this is bad:

By Drew Brown
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON - Classified military spending has reached its highest level since 1988, near the end of the Cold War, a new independent analysis has found.

Classified, or “black,” programs now appear to account for about $30.1 billion, or 19 percent, of the acquisition money the Defense Department is requesting for fiscal year 2007, according to Steven M. Kosiak, a defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, an independent policy-research organization.

The figure is more than double the amount the Pentagon requested in 1995, when classified military acquisition spending reached a post-Cold War low.  Read more