Conyers and Leahy go after health insurance parasites
Conyers, Leahy Introduce Bill To End Health Insurers' Anti-Trust Exemption
John Conyers and some allies on the House Judiciary Committee have come up with a fabulous way to get the insurance industry in line - by threatening to remove their anti-trust exemption.
They want free market, let's give them some free market and see how they like it.
- DCblogger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Support a Truth & Reconciliation Commission
I have proposed the idea of a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate abuses during the Bush-Cheney Administration -- so they never happen again. These abuses may include the use of torture, warrantless wiretapping, extraordinary rendition, and executive override of laws.
Please sign this online petition, urging Congress to consider establishing a truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the Bush-Cheney Administration's abuses.
- DCblogger's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Orrin Hatch: Comedy gold!
Orrin Hatch has this to say on retroactive immunity for the telcos in the FISA [gag] Reform Bill:
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), also on the Judiciary and Intelligence panels, said the documents did not change his position that the surveillance activities "were and are" lawful.
Senator, you're threatening my cranial integrity.
Because if the surveilllance was so lawful, what the Fuck
do they need retroactive immunity for???
Another Dem wussy bottom assumes the position for Mr. 29%
Leahy Set to Schedule Hearings on Mukasey
Demand for White House Papers Dropped
What are you thinking?
Leahy To Mukasey: Answer Corrente’s Questions!
Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) as Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee has sent a letter to President Bush’s nominee to replace Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General.
The Senator expressed many of the concerns that Fellows of and contributors to The Mighty Corrente Building have written about.
From the Senator’s letter to Mr. Mukasey:
The Attorney General who recently resigned apparently believed that the President has a commander-in-chief override of the laws of this country, which contributed to his violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), his signing statement reservations, and other overreaching. We must explore those topics. For example, do you believe that the President has authority to override legal requirements and immunize acts of torture contrary to our treaty obligations and laws? Do you believe that before Congress amended the FISA this summer, the Authorization for the Use of Military Force passed in the days following September 11, or Article II of the Constitution gave this President authority to override the requirements of that law with respect to wiretapping Americans?
In connection with these matters the Judiciary Committee has been seeking the historical legal analysis of the Department of Justice and this Administration. We have made numerous requests and have even had to subpoena the FISA documents. I want to know whether you will work with us and provide those materials so that we can examine the legal justifications that have been utilized by this Administration to excuse its conduct.
Well done Senator Leahy. Now follow through – please! Read more…
- Shane-O's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Bush starts to run out the clock on FISA six month sunset provision
What a surprise. AP:
The White House on Friday asked a Senate panel for more time to produce subpoenaed information about the legal justification for President Bush's secretive eavesdropping program.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy had set Monday as the deadline for administration officials already subpoenaed to provide documents and testimony about the National Security Agency's eavesdropping program.
In Fielding's letter to Leahy, which was released by the White House in Crawford, Texas, where Bush is staying at his ranch, the president's lawyer said that while the White House had identified a core group of documents in response to the subpoenas, the work is "by no means complete" and could not be completed by Monday.
Naturally, Leahy will say "Give us what you've got," right?
And now the kicker:



Front page

Recent comments
28 min 49 sec ago
31 min ago
55 min 55 sec ago
57 min 29 sec ago
1 hour 36 min ago
2 hours 16 min ago
2 hours 19 min ago
2 hours 36 min ago
3 hours 8 min ago
3 hours 24 min ago