secrecy
Submitted by Liberty on Thu, 2007-09-20 17:55.

5
Blazing Hyperion struck his palm and enveloped the car as we burned east towards it. The light coming over the horizon and slapped me in the face as it pounded into the windshield. Long lazy miles behind us was the border into Utah from Nevada. Las Vegas, that city of lies, was fading as an object of desire in my mind. There was still a twinge back.
Maybe even now, I need. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Mon, 2006-08-14 12:47.
I didn’t see this around the blogs, but it is bad:
Recipients of “Leaks” May Be Prosecuted, Court Rules
In a momentous expansion of the government’s authority to regulate public disclosure of national security information, a federal court ruled that even private citizens who do not hold security clearances can be prosecuted for unauthorized receipt and disclosure of classified information.
The ruling (pdf) by Judge T.S. Ellis, III, denied a motion to dismiss the case of two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) who were charged under the Espionage Act with illegally receiving and transmitting classified information.
The decision is a major interpretation of the Espionage Act with implications that extend far beyond this particular case. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Thu, 2006-06-15 19:54.
You guys all know that economics make my head hurt, but this seemed pretty important.
Bottom line Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Thu, 2006-06-01 07:30.
I think it starts with an “F.” I’m sure duct tape manufacturers will be included:
By Dawn Kopecki
President George W. Bush has bestowed on his intelligence czar, John Negroponte, broad authority, in the name of national security, to excuse publicly traded companies from their usual accounting and securities-disclosure obligations. Notice of the development came in a brief entry in the Federal Register, dated May 5, 2006, that was opaque to the untrained eye. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2006-05-24 10:15.
So when I read about stuff like this, all I want to do is laugh/cry at the idea that I’m supposed to be paranoid and afraid. Really, this is our money they’re spending, and when they’re not sifting through 50,000 of today’s phone calls about what to order on the pizza and how Aunt Millie’s corns are bothering her again, they’re off chasing cheap women in grungy brothels in Central America? I’m supposed to be impressed?
That said, this is bad:
By Drew Brown
Knight Ridder Newspapers
WASHINGTON - Classified military spending has reached its highest level since 1988, near the end of the Cold War, a new independent analysis has found.
Classified, or “black,” programs now appear to account for about $30.1 billion, or 19 percent, of the acquisition money the Defense Department is requesting for fiscal year 2007, according to Steven M. Kosiak, a defense analyst at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments in Washington, an independent policy-research organization.
The figure is more than double the amount the Pentagon requested in 1995, when classified military acquisition spending reached a post-Cold War low. Read more
Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2006-05-24 10:04.
You all already know this, but it’s still a chilling litany:
State Secrets Privilege Shuts Courthouse Doors
The state secrets privilege has been invoked by the Bush Administration with greater frequency than ever before in American history in a wide range of lawsuits that the government says would threaten national security if allowed to proceed.
In virtually every case, the use of the privilege leads to dismissal of the lawsuit and forecloses the opportunity for an injured party to seek judicial relief.
Most recently, a lawsuit brought by Khaled El-Masri, a German citizen who alleged that he was kidnapped by the CIA and tortured over a five month period, was dismissed (pdf) after the CIA invoked the “state secrets” privilege.
The dismissal was not based on a finding that the allegations against the CIA were false.
“It is in no way an adjudication of, or comment on, the merit or lack of merit of El-Masri’s complaint,” wrote Judge T.S. Ellis, III in a May 12 order.
In fact, “It is worth noting that … if El-Masri’s allegations are true or essentially true, then all fair-minded people… must also agree that El-Masri has suffered injuries as a result of our country’s mistake and deserves a remedy,” he wrote in the order dismissing the case.
“Yet, it is also clear from the result reached here that the only sources of that remedy must be the Executive Branch or the Legislative Branch, not the Judicial Branch,” he suggested. Read more
|
Recent comments
8 sec ago
1 min 39 sec ago
2 min 17 sec ago
3 min 8 sec ago
9 min 12 sec ago
17 min 10 sec ago
18 min 7 sec ago
18 min 13 sec ago
19 min 50 sec ago
21 min 6 sec ago
21 min 53 sec ago
23 min 5 sec ago
23 min 36 sec ago
26 min 3 sec ago
28 min 59 sec ago
29 min 37 sec ago
29 min 54 sec ago
30 min 30 sec ago
36 min 5 sec ago
37 min 17 sec ago