[Updates below on blogosphere, media coverage.]
The only problem with firing all the attorney’s who weren’t “loyal Bushies” and who were investigating Republicans—Lam—or wouldn’t smear Democrats—Iglesias?
The Explainer didn’t do his job. But then, does he ever? From Bush’s speech today at 5:45:
[BUSH] The Justice
Department, with the approval of the White House, believed new leadership in these positions would better serve our country. The announcement of this decision and the subsequent explanation of these changes has been confusing and, in some cases, incomplete. Neither the Attorney General, nor I approve of how these explanations were handled.
I’ll bet.
We’re determined to correct the problem.
And how! Er, I mean, and how?
[BUSH] It will be regrettable if they choose to head down the partisan road of issuing subpoenas and demanding show trials when I have agreed to make key White House officials and documents available.
Sweet Jeebus! Since when is testifying under oath about potential obstruction of justice a “show trial?” Talk about overheated rhetoric! And since when does the executive determine who gets to testify before the legislative branch? And who said the exective gets to throw out chaff and then call it “unpredented disclosure”? Gosh, it’s almost like Bush wants to be the judge and jury in his own case, isn’t it?
Unbelievably, Bush takes questions. (So where’s “Jeff Gannon” when we need him to throw The Explainer some softballs? Under Karl’s desk?)
And speaking of obstruction of justice, Bush doesn’t speak of it: Read more
Recent comments
56 sec ago
3 min 11 sec ago
5 min 55 sec ago
6 min 32 sec ago
6 min 42 sec ago
7 min 25 sec ago
9 min 29 sec ago
9 min 41 sec ago
12 min 32 sec ago
12 min 49 sec ago
13 min 11 sec ago
25 min 28 sec ago
25 min 31 sec ago
31 min 40 sec ago
33 min 26 sec ago
34 min 49 sec ago
37 min 3 sec ago
37 min 18 sec ago
37 min 36 sec ago
39 min 39 sec ago