So, if it's a "moral necessity" to spend over $100B a year to enforce "women's rights" in Afghanistan, why is it so hard to spend a couple of hundred million on American women who are poor but supposedly already have the right to choose? Just wonderin'.

"The election forces the pro-life movement to go back to what we do best — local grass-roots organizing," said the Rev. Patrick J. Mahoney, director of the Christian Defense Coalition. "We will not go silently into the night."

From an AP story carried on Yahoo: just because they got beat in California, the anti-choice groups aren't through. They want to make sure you know they're still angry.

Priests for Life (how's that for irony?) has a spokesman named Frank Pavone. He wants to remind the nation that the adoption or single motherhood is still preferable to abortion in the view of the church.

Bill Pucko today gets something right in comparing accredited basketball referee Michelle Campbell to suffragist Susan B. Anthony, and lauding the actions of Darin Putthof and Fred Shockey, a couple of male refs who refused to join a Kansas school's misogyny at a recent game. Unfortunately, right after that he reverts to his normal crapheadedness

Here you find a 29 year old Afghani woman who is not long for this world. She says she does not foresee a long life. I believe her.

Malalai Joya