<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>mcauliffe</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/mcauliffe"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2443/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2443/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-02-07T11:02:15-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Problem: Terry Mc Edition</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_problem_terry_mc_edition" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/the_problem_terry_mc_edition</id>
    <published>2007-02-07T11:02:15-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-02-07T11:02:15-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dem on Dem Violence" />
    <category term="Department of What is WRONG with These People?" />
    <category term="Beltway Consultants" />
    <category term="DNC" />
    <category term="fundraising" />
    <category term="mcauliffe" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Here's a great takedown of that pariah thankfully no longer running the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/04/books/review/Perlstein.t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=review&amp;oref=slogin">the DNC.</a> I'm told this is the "polite" version; I'm sure if I were to research Terry in-depth I'd have some strong stuff to say. There is much to explain what the problem is in party in this piece, here's a quote I liked particularly:</p>
<blockquote><p>
By his own account, his friends are always selfless, whether itâ€™s Dick Gephardt driving four hours to pick out just the right puppy for the McAuliffe kids or a strip-mall builder doing a financial favor for the Democrats (â€œTerry, weâ€™ve got to do this for the sake of the partyâ€). By his own account, too, McAuliffe is always a hero: he saves the Democratic Party (several times); he even saves a small, struggling independent bank (itâ€™s a wonderful life). But in real life thereâ€™s always a cost, and the political effects of McAuliffeâ€™s rehabilitation of the Democrats among the wealthy may be nugatory.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
