<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>entertainment</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/entertainment"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2560/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2560/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-02-25T22:15:35-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The Oscar Walk From Another View</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/the_oscar_walk_from_another_view" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/the_oscar_walk_from_another_view</id>
    <published>2007-02-25T22:15:35-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-02-25T22:15:35-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>chicago dyke</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Disinformation" />
    <category term="Department of Changing the Subject" />
    <category term="entertainment" />
    <category term="oscars" />
    <category term="racism" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>I really don't know about, nor care about, whatever movies have been nominated this year. Two words why the Oscars mean nothing to my Netflix queue: "Gladiator" and "Casablanca." Anyway, I was surfing around my usual news list, and I came across <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-02/26/content_5773319_2.htm">this.</a> Scroll up and down the number brackets for other photos (bottom). Interesting, innit? I mean- how does this "summation" of "who's who" at the Oscars Red Carpet walk compare to what you've seen in the US media? Hint: how many blondes are there at my link? I don't know who these people are, but I find it an interesting gallery, as I'm sure if I went to CNN or ABC, few if any of these people would've made the "best dressed on the red carpet walk" photo montage. </p>
<p>I, for one, welcome our new Han masters. They may be racist, but at least they're willing to admit that brown is often pretty.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
