<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>conservapedia</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/conservapedia"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2690/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/2690/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2007-03-08T07:49:23-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Conservapedia endorses Fred Thompson, but doesn&#039;t define vagina</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/conservapedia_endorses_fred_thompson_but_doesnt_define_vagina" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/conservapedia_endorses_fred_thompson_but_doesnt_define_vagina</id>
    <published>2007-05-31T22:50:17-04:00</published>
    <updated>2007-05-31T23:27:34-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>lambert</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Department of What is WRONG with These People?" />
    <category term="conservapedia" />
    <category term="Conservatives" />
    <category term="Fred Thompson" />
    <category term="vagina" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>So much for the idea that the Conservapedia guys are anything but Republican operatives, eh? And so much for the "Neutral Point of View" that Wikipedia uses. I mean, did the Encyclopedia Brittanica endorse Margaret Thatcher? </p>
<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/202/524214640_8d0163d0a3.jpg" width="484" height="500" alt="thompson" /></p>
<p>But actually, I went to Conservapedia, inspired by <a href="http://www.correntewire.com/people_are_using_wikipedia_to_learn_about_sex">Xan</a>, to see what the conservative definition of <i>vagina</i> is. Here it is:</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Conservapedia Word of the Day: Economics Lecture</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/conservapedia_word_of_the_day_economics_lecture" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/conservapedia_word_of_the_day_economics_lecture</id>
    <published>2007-03-08T07:49:23-05:00</published>
    <updated>2007-03-08T07:49:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>trifecta</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Theocracy Rising" />
    <category term="Department of What is WRONG with These People?" />
    <category term="andy schlafly" />
    <category term="conservapedia" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Today, the Conservapedia honors us with <a href="http://www.conservapedia.com/Economics_Lecture_One">an economics lecture</a> by world renowned economist Andy Schlafly. He's Phyllis Schlafly's kid who isn't the one whom Ann Coulter would call "a faggot". He is well qualified to teach economics because he is a lawyer who <a href="http://hometown.aol.com/dfjoseph/abortionattorney.html">specializes in medical malpractice</a> cases accusing doctors of creating cancer through abortion.</p>
<p>Schlafly also is the legal counsel for the<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons"> Association of American Physicians and Surgeons</a>, a right wing medical organziation that opposes manditory vaccines, opposes HIPPA regulations, and filed a brief defending Rush Limbaugh for his hillbilly heroin usage. I am ready to learn from the economic master now!</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
