<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>pathetic advocacy groups</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/pathetic_advocacy_groups"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/5988/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/5988/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-05-17T02:07:51-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>NARAL:  Trolling for a New Generation of Suckers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/naral_trolling_for_a_new_generation_of_suckers" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/naral_trolling_for_a_new_generation_of_suckers</id>
    <published>2008-05-17T02:04:20-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-05-17T02:07:51-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>BDBlue</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics of Choice" />
    <category term="Department of No! They Would Never to Do That!" />
    <category term="abortion rights" />
    <category term="pathetic advocacy groups" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>At least now we know why NARAL endorsed Obama.  From <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10408.html">The Politico (emphasis mine):</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In an interview with Politico, NARAL President Nancy Keenan said the group’s nine-member political action committee chose Obama after extensive deliberation that included studying the two Democratic candidates’ delegate counts (both pledged and superdelegates), their viability in a matchup against the presumptive Republican nominee, Sen. John McCain, and <strong>their cash on hand.</strong></p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
