<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Lugar</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/lugar"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/6296/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/6296/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-06-29T12:57:42-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Can Senator Lugar save the Republican party?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/can_senator_lugar_save_republican_party" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/can_senator_lugar_save_republican_party</id>
    <published>2008-12-25T22:54:31-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-12-26T01:15:13-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>DCblogger</name>
    </author>
    <category term="In Sickness and In Health" />
    <category term="Bayh" />
    <category term="HR 676" />
    <category term="Indiana" />
    <category term="Lugar" />
    <category term="Medicare for All" />
    <category term="Senate" />
    <category term="single payer" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p><img src="http://speakout.com/VoteMatch/people/Richard_Lugar.jpg" alt="http://speakout.com/VoteMatch/people/Richard_Lugar.jpg" /><br />
<em>Will this man play de Klerk to Conyers’ Mandela?</em></p>
<p>Yesterday nyceve had a diary on health care that asked readers to contact Richard Lugar and ask him to introduce a Senate version of <a href="http://www.johnconyers.com/healthcare">HR 676</a>. Since Lugar was specifically singled out, I assume there is some reason to believe that he is receptive to the idea. I don’t know much about Lugar other than the obvious, and I don’t know much about Indiana politics. What follows is pure speculation, make of it what you will.</p>
<p>One of my high school teachers was fond of saying that there were two reasons for everything, the good one and the real one.</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Obama: Bush Term 3?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/obama_bush_term_3" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/obama_bush_term_3</id>
    <published>2008-06-29T12:49:47-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-06-29T12:57:42-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Truth Partisan</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Department of All The Damn Gall" />
    <category term="Bush Term 3" />
    <category term="conservative" />
    <category term="Defense" />
    <category term="GATES" />
    <category term="Lugar" />
    <category term="obama" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <p>Now Mr. Obama and his campaign advisors are <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/6/29/10343/7542">floating</a> the idea<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4232070.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&amp;attr=797093"> of keeping </a> Sec'y of Defense GATES on as Sec'y in the "anti-war," Democratic Obama Administration? </p>
<p>Admittedly Mr. Gates's no Rumsfeld.</p>
<p>But gee, this makes Obama's <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article3466823.ece">idea </a> of nominating Sen. Lugar for Sec'y of State (R., Chair of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, one of 8 congressional members briefed by Bush during this war, and famed Obama mentor) look merely conservative.</p>
<p>Our new war policies: same as our old war policies?</p>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
