<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Sittenfeld</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/tags/sittenfeld"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/6359/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.correntewire.com/taxonomy/term/6359/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-07-09T23:14:43-04:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>On the Fictionalizing of Laura Bush</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.correntewire.com/on_the_fictionalizing_of_laura_bush" />
    <id>http://www.correntewire.com/on_the_fictionalizing_of_laura_bush</id>
    <published>2008-07-09T23:14:43-04:00</published>
    <updated>2008-07-09T23:14:43-04:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Truth Partisan</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Dowd" />
    <category term="fictionalizing" />
    <category term="Laura Bush" />
    <category term="Sittenfeld" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[ <blockquote><p>"But there’s only one vessel that can ferry you past Laura’s moat, and that’s fiction. Ms. Sittenfeld has creatively applied her crayons to all the ambiguous blanks in the coloring book. It isn’t an invasion of privacy. Art has always been made out of the stories of kings and queens. Fictionalizing historical figures is fine. Fantasies about public figures are inevitable. The question of an ostensibly ordinary girl who lives through extraordinary things will always be gripping."--<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/09/opinion/09dowd.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&amp;oref=slogin"> Maureen Dowd, today in the NY Times</a></p>
</p></blockquote>
     ]]></summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
