That is why

A few days back, a Corrente Senior Fellow popped in to suggest that many of the posts here in recent months haven't been, as advertised, "objective media critique or part of a campaign to defeat sexism," rather they're "a symptom of tribal warfare within the internet-enabled progressive social network that is being fueled by the Corporate Media and exploited by the Republicans."

In other words, we're pissing in the Democratic pool to vent our petty online grudges... because we've been tricked by the GOP into doing so.

I don't know the life expectancy of the hamsters that make the Mighty Corrente Building's server disks go round and round, but I do wonder how all this will look a couple of years from now.

If it's President Obama, we'll get to see whose "I told you sos" are in order. (And they called me petty!)

If it's President McCain, we'll get to start even sooner, playing out whether it was an ill-chosen candidate (i.e., they should have listened to us about a different candidate, vote fraud, and disreputable media and blogging) running on an ill-chosen platform (shoulda listened to us about partisanship) or the Judean People's Front disunity of Hillary holdouts or some other sin of the notorious party-destroyer. Odds are, the genius solution in 2012 will be for a Democrat to run as similarly to a Republican as possible. Fourth time's a charm.

Well, with the campaign kicking into its ultimate phase, I wanted to front-page (from comments in shystee's thread) my reasons for doing what I do, when I'm stealing time from real life:

My reasons for Obama-critical blogging:

1. To the extent it might have once been possible, help the Dems get a better (more progressive, more grounded, higher-character, more electable, more-effective Overton-window-leftward-moving, stronger-governing, prouder-to-be-a-Democrat) nominee.

2. To the extent (now 100%) that it isn't, encourage Obama to build the Democratic brand instead of constantly throwing its constituencies and brand equity under the bus. For one thing, getting him to stop leveraging his campaign on what a great man once called "the absolute fabrication that the problem with Washington is excessive partisanship." His convention speech last week -- if also backsliding on this issue -- showed the first signs of promise that pressure from his base may be yielding dividends, and for some of us our "I might vote for Obama" meter inched toward the green.

My reasons for criticism of lame or inappropriate anti-GOP blogging:

Truthiness rots everything, and so does sleaze. Shame on the Obama campaign and the leftysphere if we can't and won't build a solid case about what's wrong with John McCain and his party, and we instead become poo slingers who turn jokes into gotcha quotes and slime our way up candidates' uteri. For seven years, the progressive blogosphere knew how to pound these guys where they deserve it, and now it's gravitating to fake and trivial issues in what's an insult to an American public that wised up much better than the media did, and voted for hope and change in 2006 and got fucked... and just wanted someone to tell them straight what it's going to take for things to get better.

As to complaints about obnoxious Obama fans, almost every corner of progressive discourse became overrun early this year with truthy, starry-eyed bullies. Some of us find that concerning and quite of a piece with some things that have come directly from the Obama campaign.

Note: Title origin.

Comments

no positive case for Obama....

Shame on the Obama campaign and the leftysphere if we can’t and won’t build a solid case about what’s wrong with John McCain and his party, and we instead become poo slingers who turn jokes into gotcha quotes and slime our way up candidates’ uteri.

We shouldn't have to be building a case against McCain and the GOP. Instead, we should have the material with which to build a solid case for a Democratic president.

A large part of the problem is that between elections, it makes sense to focus on a critique of the opposition, but during elections the focus should be on promoting the candidacy of our candidate -- not because we want to be "nice", but in order to empower our candidate to do what s/he promises once s/he is elected. That "the opposition is worse" rhetoric achieves nothing in terms of positive change.

But the Obama campaign has made it virtually impossible to build a credible positive case for his election, because he stands for nothing. He's merely a collection of focus-grouped talking points, and while he may be "better than McCain", his lack of any real commitment to a progressive agenda leaves us with nothing to use to promote his candidacy.

The video link says no

The video link says no longer available at YouTube

It's still working for me

Sometimes you just need to refresh (F5) the tab/page with the video, and then YouTube can play it.

Obama will win big

I think the GOP is imploding and that Obama will win with a landslide.

that is not a reason to stop criticizing him, just my prediction. not that anyone asked.

You could be right!

This year, nobody knows anything...

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi

Too much hopium, DCB

I've seen you mention before that you live inside the Beltway, so I'm working off that.

I think you are far off base, and I think that's why. The GOP was gonna implode, and Kerry was gonna win in a landslide, according to the Beltway Dems in 04.

There's such a disconnect, between there, and the rest of the country, that I don't think the lens you are viewing this election thru is very clear. I live in a state that could have gone for Clinton, and won't go for Obama. Every Clinton supporter I talk to in RL*, won't vote for Obama. I know only a few Democrats, AA or White, who plan on voting for Obama. Most won't vote for McCain either, though some will.

The schism in the Democratic party is wider than a lot of people want to believe, and it is only getting worse, and the things they want from the Dem candidate, keep getting ignored, like UHC and the economy.

It's gonna be close, election theft close.

* In my state or elsewhere, people are saying this, offline.

And thank you, Obamaoids, for making open criticism

subject to accusations of racism.

Nice to give the home-grown focus groups who represented undecided voters the permission to not tell you the truth until it's too late.

And hooray for you sucking up to traditional GOP voters who were milling around until Palin brought them home. How's that working for ya?

Look, to take it up a level, no one wants Arthur Silber to be right. But he always is. Does that mean we stop listening to him, or do we brace ourselves as being called worse than Nazi Germany for the next century?

Do you listen to us, lurking Dem operative, or do you brace yourself for being one of the assholes who turned a landslide into a win for a government you just turned our privacy and economy over for the last 8 years? You had two years to show you wouldn't fuck up, and you failed. You have this election to turn that around, and you are failing.

At least you should have a sense of self-preservation, and feel compelled to reach out and help us convince our fellow unsure voters that Obama and Biden would actually *do* something for them other than not be McCain/Palin.

What Aeryl said

Every Clinton supporter I talk to in RL*, won’t vote for Obama. I know only a few Democrats, AA or White, who plan on voting for Obama. Most won’t vote for McCain either, though some will.

Now that I've returned to work and am (slowly) starting to talk to people about the election, this is what I'm finding too. (None planning to vote for McCain, but mostly thinking of not voting at all at the top of the ticket.)

But I'm also not seeing a whole lot of Obama buttons, etc. Exactly three (3), in two weeks of traveling around the city a lot and teaching at a college where one would expect a lot of Obama supporters.

So not scientific. Anecdote, FWIW. But if I were supporting Obama I wouldn't be happy.

---------------
We can't afford not to have single-payer!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Feed the hamsters...

... that work the wheels that keep the Mighty Corrente servers turning. Help us cover monthly hamster kibble anxiety:

...or provide temporary relief:

Thank you!

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.