Home » Blogs » vastleft's blog

The Clinton hate is out there

Submitted by vastleft on Wed, 2008-01-23 15:59.

Just this afternoon…

I heard Rush Limbaugh say that he “likes” Obama, and he gave “Barry” an earful of advice about how to beat the contemptible Clintons.

Two relatives sent me sludgy Bill-bashing links from Rupert’s Wall Street Journal and Maureen “Cleaned-Up Coulter” Dowd.

Bookmark/Search this post with:
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Well, that's reassuring, isn't it?

Submitted by lambert on Wed, 2008-01-23 16:23.

The rightward slide continues.

Got a link to a transcript? I’ve got this “If loving you is right wing” riff going through my mind….

[x] Any (D) in the general. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Nope, I just heard it on the radio

Submitted by vastleft on Wed, 2008-01-23 16:29.

Panic in the rightwing is too good to miss, doncha think?

And for xtreme DCOW reasons, I left off the WSJ and Dowd links. Bottom-feeders know where to find ’em.

i still can't decide--do they want to run against Hill or Obama?

Submitted by amberglow (not verified) on Wed, 2008-01-23 17:45.

Or would they be happy with either one?

(btw: the math questions keep getting harder—why is that?)

amberglow (& i luv your nym, btw) you heard it here 1st

Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2008-01-23 17:57.

it’s because it will be both obama and hillary in the fall. likely with her on top. i may be wrong, but my money is on the “dyke/nigger” ticket for the dems in 08. we’ll see what other pet theories of mine such a ticket would test.

your nym makes me think of…well, this is a family blog, so i won’t go there. nice choice, tho.

That's not the question

Submitted by lambert on Wed, 2008-01-23 17:59.

They’ll be happy with either Hillary or Obama or McCain or Romney.

The key point is to have ruled out Edwards and Paul. Which is almost certainly what the press has done for Paul, and what they’re still trying to do to Edwards, but since the Dems don’t have winner take all primaries, he’s still picking up delegates.

[x] Any (D) in the general. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

Mostly, they just want to keep hating on the Clintons

Submitted by vastleft on Wed, 2008-01-23 18:01.

Because they came to power right as the conservative hate machine got up to full speed.

They’ve been locked onto that brilliant, slippery power couple so long, I’m sure they don’t even remember why they hate them, and I’m not sure they ever had a good reason to, besides feelings of inferiority and the unacceptability of any constraints on the Right’s lust for power and lucre.

/hastily brooms ashes back into kitchen firepit/

Submitted by chicago dyke on Wed, 2008-01-23 18:09.

sorry, lb. tangents aren’t for those daughters who aren’t going to the ball and won’t ever meet the prince. i’ll be more quiet next time. ;-)

i think you're right, chicago--

Submitted by amberglow (not verified) on Thu, 2008-01-24 08:36.

this has them already publically talking about the 2 of them—
RNC chairman provides numbers, strategy to defeat top Democrats —
http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/rnc-cha…

your nym makes me think of…well, this is a family blog, so i won’t go there. nice choice, tho.

; > (actually it’s the color of my aura, i was told when i was 18—and i used it as a drag name ages ago)