Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

The mess at UVA

lambert's picture

? If you care about the destruction of higher education, the ousting of UVA's President Sullivan, and the manner of it, are really instructive. See here and here for a summary of events.

Here's a statement from the Dean of the Undergraduate Business School, Carl Zeithaml, the interim President as of last night's extraordinary board meeting, on the events. Read the whole thing for some priceless* mealy-mouthed Dean-speak as processed through a business jargon grinder. Here's the sentence I thought was the most hilarious:

At this time, we should rely on one of our most important assets: our strong sense of community.

Well.

If you've read the two links above, you know that a three-person faction on the University Board (the board of visitors), led by a Hampton Roads real estate developer:

1. Gave the ousted President, Sullivan, a mediocre performance review but put nothing in writing;

2. With a quorum of three (themselves), and with none of the other thirteen board members present, voted the President out;

3. With no notice;

4. Giving no public reason;

5. While claiming the meeting where they voted to fire Sullivan was emergency meeting, although it didn't meet the statutory criteria for such a meeting, circumventing public notice rules.

Some "comunity"!

I don't have a lot of sympathy for academic administrators (up here in the Great State of Maine, one-third of the budget is sucked up by "the system," even though nobody can explain what it does) but those process violations are egregious. Great universities don't change leadership with boardroom coups.

"Community," my sweet Aunt Fanny. The people outside the closed boardroom doors, waiting to hear the fate of their university, are the community, not the dull-witted and intransigent board members, who could easily have done the right thing, and if they were unhappy with President Sullivan, change the leadership using a deliberative and open process, rather than a sleazy putsch orchestrated by second-rate minds.

NOTE * Or priceful; the Board has retained Hill and Knowlton to handle clean-up and decontamination.

NOTE One of the things UVA's board wants to do is get rid of the German and Classics Departments. Which is odd, given that Berlin and Athens are key players in the current financial crisis. It's as if the elite are determined on blinding themselves, as they drag the rest of us over the cliff with them.

UPDATE Teh stupid -- it b-u-r-n-n-n-s!

One of the key complaints of the board members who orchestrated the ouster of Teresa A. Sullivan as president of the University of Virginia was that she rebuffed their suggestions that she eliminate or sharply cut German programs, sources familiar with the discussions have told Inside Higher Ed. The Washington Post on Sunday reported that one of the most specific disagreements between board members and Sullivan was their view that she "lacked the mettle to trim or shut down programs that couldn't sustain themselves financially, such as obscure academic departments in classics and German."

Jeebus. I can't think of any reason for speaking German or Greek.

UPDATE Here is Rector Dragas's statement, translated into English. It's better than Zeithaml's!!!

0
No votes yet

Comments

lambert's picture
Submitted by lambert on

Had our own President up here in my head. Fixed.

jest's picture
Submitted by jest on

BBC:

Progress by degrees: MIT and Harvard plan a 'revolution' as they bring courses online

Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have formed a $60m (£38m) alliance to launch edX, a platform to deliver courses online - with the modest ambition of "revolutionising education around the world".
...
The internet provides an unparalleled capacity to expand the reach - but it also raises far-reaching and thorny questions for the traditional model of a university.

Harvard, birthplace of Facebook, has joined a project to put courses as well as social lives online
"We've crossed the tipping point," says Professor Agarwal. The courses being launched in the autumn, he anticipates, will have at least 500,000 students - and probably many more.

As an example of how courses might be delivered, the MITx prototype taught an electronics course using an interactive virtual laboratory, e-textbooks, online discussions and video lectures.

Assessment of the course, which took 10 hours per week, was entirely automated.

They are even trying to say that this is the solution to Montreal students' problems.

It's funny how the solutions for problems caused by neo-liberalism is more neo-liberalism. Strange how that works.

lambert's picture
Submitted by lambert on

And Maine, because of its poverty and size, was a pioneer in "distance learning" as they call it.

One more symptom that the elite doesn't even want to physically encounter the proles.

Got a link on the Montreal connection?

lambert's picture
Submitted by lambert on

https://twitter.com/NBC29/status/215178030753124352

That leaves the Rector, who must also go for the process issues, but that also leaves the issue of policy in place.

Funny flashpoint, education. In Montreal, now here?

DCblogger's picture
Submitted by DCblogger on

is not that different from perverting public schools into charter schools. It is just that UVa is sufficiently elite that the 1% are affected.

lambert's picture
Submitted by lambert on

But it's not the whole story. The university as an institution has survived, for what, over a thousand years? And they aren't corporate entities, not even now. And I really do believe in scholarship and passing along deep knowledge and there isn't really another institution that does that, for all the flaws of the system. So it's yet another one of the ravages of the neo-liberal dispensation, and to be mourned, I feel.

okanogen's picture
Submitted by okanogen on

Generally, I hate the entire idea of "school experiments", because experiments necessarily involve failure. Why should any child be forced to be a test subject in a failed experiment? This also of course goes for the "free market" theory of education "reform", where "the market decides" what is a good and bad school. That also takes time and necessitates failed schools to "weed out" the good.

That said, I think there are diverse methods of teaching just as their are diverse methods of learning or thought. There are also different needs based on cultural diversity. Some people/children need more structure, some are killed by it. Some need language resources or other needs that are specific to a small group.

My son was in a "traditional" brick and mortar elementary last year, was bullied, was stifled by a strict, but disengaged teacher, hated going and being there making each day an emotional struggle and generally fell back in every measure of learning. We pulled him out and put him in a non-profit Montessori charter school, he loves it, has rebounded beyond our expectations, and is both happy and learning. They have zero tolerance for bullying (which has resulted in many kids being removed from the school), they seek out locally grown food (as opposed to the ketchup, french fries and mac and cheese of the traditional school), the kids are loved and treated with respect.

Not all charter schools are evil, in fact, I would say this is an opportunity for local involvement. We don't necessarily need to let the greedheads win.