Today's Ladies' Auxiliary single-payer post

gob's picture

In addition to the Health Subcomittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, H.R. 676 is before the Health Subcommittee of the Ways and Means Committee, and it has also been referred to the Natural Resources Committee. The Ways and Means Health Subcommittee is the subject of this post.

Executive summary: unlike DCBLogger, who pointed out two HR676-supporting challengers in PA, I didn't turn up any races of definite interest. There are a couple that may bear watching to see if any more information turns up. I did stumble over Pete Stark's surprising constitutional amendment (see below).

Democratic membership:

Pete Stark, CA13, Chairman. Startlingly, although he's not a co-sponsor of H.R. 676, he has introduced a Constitutional Amendment to "establish a right to health care of equal high quality for every American."

He also introduced the "AmeriCare Health Insurance Act of 2006" in July 2006, a mixed public-private universal system. The bill had 36 cosponsors, including some of the same people who cosponsor H.R. 676. It was referred to three committees but no other action was taken; he re-introduced it in the 110th Congress in March 2007, when it attracted 31 cosponsors and was referred to the same three committees.

He is obviously strong on health issues, including defending Medicare from the privatizers. I wonder what it would take to get him on board for single-payer.

Lloyd Doggett, TX-25

Mike Thompson, CA-01

Rahm Emanuel, IL-05

Xavier Becerra, California, one of two H.R. 676 cosponsors on this subcommittee; he is running unopposed, as he did last time.

Earl Pomeroy, ND

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, OH-11, one of two H.R. 676 cosponsors on this subcommittee; at a glance, this looks like a safe seat (Cleveland).

Ron Kind, WI-03. He does not look like an ally, from his web page, which emphasizes cost containment over accessibility.

Republican membership:

Dave Camp, Michigan. Opposed by Andrew D Concannon

Sam Johnson, Texas. Opposed by Tom Daley

Jim Ramstad, Minnesota. The status of this race is unclear. It seems on first glance that Ramstad is not running. The Democratic candidate is Ashwin Madia.

Phil English, PA-03. He has two challengers, an independent who appears to be a bit over the edge, and a Democrat, Kathy Dahlkemper. This might be an interesting race, given that the independent, Porter, got 42% of the vote two years ago. The Democrat doesn't seem to support single payer, but does support "universal" care, so this one might be worth putting some effort into. The district runs from Erie, PA through Meadville down to Butler.

Kenny C. Hulshof, Missouri. He is running for governor, so this seat is open. There are four Democrats competing in a primary to be held August 5th. I haven't found enough information to have an opinion about any of them, except Lyndon Bode, who is pro-life and "for a strong military" (whatever that means).

* Steve Gaw

* Judy Baker

* Lyndon Bode

* Ken Jacob

Unlike DCBlogger's examination of the Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee, this data doesn't seem to offer any indications of important races. However, Pete Stark looks like a person of interest for the cause.

On another note, a Thomas search on H.R. 676 shows no subcomittee or committee hearings or markup sessions ever. I take this as a sign that either the committee and/or subcommittee chairs want the bill to die, and/or they know the votes are not there, and they don't want to spend time working on a bill that isn't going anywhere before the next Congress. If any knowledgeable person has a comment on that inference, I'd love to see it.

Sources for this post: The Library of Congress THOMAS site, the House Ways and Means Committee web site, and Race Tracker.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DCblogger's picture

thanks

that is an excellent run down and gives us a good first sift on where we need to give further attention.

bringiton's picture

Pete Stark

IIRC first introduced a national health care bill in 1990. He has since moved to the Constitutional ammendment approach because he views access to health care as a basic human right that should be provided a greater guarantee than just statutory law.

From his web site:

ESTABLISHING UNIVERSAL ACCESS
TO QUALITY HEALTH CARE

Our wealthy and prosperous nation continues to leave 45 million people - including 8 million children - without health insurance. Every American should have affordable, quality health care coverage and expanding health care coverage to the uninsured, especially children, must be a top priority.

I've introduced a Constitutional Amendment to establish a right to health care for of equal high quality for every American. If ratified, this would force Congress to make health care coverage available to all Americans. My preferred approach to universal coverage is to build on the success of the Medicare program, which provides universal health care for our nation's seniors and people with disabilities.

Stark is a good guy. Sometimes, when he gets angry, his mouth runs ahead of his brain; nobody's perfect. Otherwise, he's a totally solid citizen.

Help the hamsters with their winter heating bill ...

… as they power the wheels that turn the servers at The Mighty Corrente Building. Please, won’t you help them keep their cages shiny?

No PayPal Account required! Give the hamsters immediate relief!

Or Subscribe to make a monthly payment!

Corrente is completely supported by contributions from readers. Thank you!

Download Citibank Plutonomy files

Part 1 [PDF]

Part 2 [PDF]

Good reading! Favorite quote: What could go wrong?
Beyond war, inflation, the end of the technology/productivity wave, and financial collapse, we think the most potent and short-term threat would be societies demanding a more ‘equitable’ share of wealth.

The 12 Word Platform

1. Medicare for All

2. End the Wars

3. Tax the Rich

4. A Jobs Guarantee

Senior fellows of The Mighty Corrente Building

Leah (CA), Lambert (PA/ME), RDF (??), BDBlue (DC), Hipparchia (FL), MsExPat (NY), letsgetitdone (DC), twig (LA), Tony Wikrent, (NC), jawbone (PA).

Corresponding fellows

danps.

Western Coordinator

coyotecreek

Correspondents

Health care reform: DCBlogger.

Fellows emeritus

mjs, Riggsveda, Tresy, Tom, hekebolos, chicagodyke, shystee, and Xenophon, Vastleft (MA), Sarah (TX).

Random term

Acronym. Modern Monetary Theory. Key takeaway: Since the United States is sovereign in its own currency, Federal spending is not operationally constrained by revenues (unlike non-sovereign households, non-sovereign states that use Federal dollars, like CA, or countries, like Greece, that use the Euro).

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Americans United is dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.