Asked if Gonzales will stay, White House Press Secretary Tony Snow said Monday: “We hope so. He has the [dreaded vote of] confidence of the president.” But Snow also revealed [unintentionally, I’m sure!] that Bush had not talked to Gonzales since a conversation the two had when Bush was in Mexico last week.
Translation: “Nice knowin’ ya, pal!”
And it couldn’t happen to a nicer authoritarian enabler!










Front page
Abu Al's trip to the unemployment line may be delayed
The rush to predict his imminent sackage overlooks not just Bush’s monumental reluctance to let it seem that he is being “forced” to do anything (I bet he was a bitch of a 2 year old…on second thought I retract the use of past tense.) There is also the matter that DoJ is one of the prime legs of the stool of power that most if not all of BushCo’s malfeasance sits on.
The AG is the bulwark of legitimizing everything from signing statements to Unitary Executive to authorization of torture to abolition of habeae corpus to …well hell, damn near everything. Whoever is in that slot has to be utterly, totally in the tank, a True Believer in the Bush As All Powerful theory. He’s the adamantium shield (RIP Captain America) giving cover of legitimacy while the dismantling of the rule of law goes on behind it.
Or as US News & World Report’s political blog put it:
Heh. Hee hee hee. Ho ho ho ho ….BwAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHahaha…excuse me, I nearly gave myself hiccups there, seeing a line like that in a Major News Publication, not some product of dirty fucking hippie lefties. That sezzit all, dunnit? Who the hell can they get who is both crooked enough to defend the Bush Totalitarianism and able to get past a Democratic-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee?? Somehow I don’t think Ted Olsen quite fits the bill. We’ll know how desperate they really are when JoeLie Berman starts claiming they offered it to him. :)
Hee hee…oops, almost set myself off again. dammit, I must stop this. I go to fetch strong drink and a kerchief to daub my eyes.
:)
Rummy set the precedent
…for hanging on past even usefulness as a pawn to deflect direct criticism of the maladministration. His replacement should be a pretty good example of what can be expected. There are always shills who will take a fall now for rewards later.
Ruth
the way around the senate:
“temporary” appointment via executive order. then drag heels for the next two years, “looking” for a permanent appointment who will go before the senate.
but i agree with xan: it’s a big question whether the 2 year old in chief will even fire his good buddy abu G. i just spent a long weekend with a toddler, and i agree that convincing them to eat their veggies and put poopy in the potty is hard, hard work.
more reasons to keep abu g on board:
nitpicker
as xan notes, this is the pillar of the criminal administration. tear this down, and soooooooooooo much more will come crashing.
also: no hearings today.