Twistunderstanding

One of the sleaziest tactics in modern politics is manufactured shock at deliberately "misunderstood" comments.

I was repulsed when John McCain did it to John Kerry, and I'm repulsed when Barack Obama sends his supporters scurrying about tsk-tsking a twistunderstanding of the Clintons' remarks about the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., who is plainly a hero to them, as he is to any American with a conscience.

Obama, who's fond of telling progressives what they have to take to heart (think: Jesus on a pony), might want to consider the words of the good Reverend:

Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Thank you

This past week has been absolutely maddening. I love this blog and just had to check what your take on all this was: Thank God.

I was about to lose my mind with everyone turning benign comments from the Clintons and their supporters into "Racist attacks!"--a "pattern"--and combining it with a blatant double standard, in which Obama remained unscathed when he had his national co-chair, Jackson, unleash an ugly, racially charged attack against Clinton the day after NH as did a prominent supporter, Dyson, who made it clear that any criticism of Obama was "racial in subtext" and suggested that Clinton's voters were likely racist.

Note: the only exception on the Clinton side was Johnson, a supporter, but even he paled in comparison to Dyson. And no one seemed to criticize Obama's prior flirtations with baiting: D-Punjab or McClurkin. Clinton fired Shaheen; Obama has not fired anyone.

Again, thanks.

Though I'm loud and proud against Kumbaya with...

... today's ruthless, corrupt, valueless, and incompetent Republican Party, I am glad that the Obama and Clinton camps have sworn off the low blows. I do hope that holds.

It was pretty depressing in the wake of that truce, that Tim Russert started this week's debate with about thirty lame personality-centered and tempest-in-a-teapot questions before anything of substance was brought up.

And, lest we forget, there's a third "major" candidate whose message gets further drowned out by the sleazy cheap-shot stories.