Volcker: Bailouts "not consistent with a capitalistic system"

[Click through for an even more mind-blowing Volcker quote. -- lambert]

Obama advisor Volcker* via Bloomberg:

The bailout measures were ``distasteful'' [although I understand that a taste for $250 billion can be acquired] and ``not consistent with a capitalistic system,'' Volcker said at a lecture in Singapore today.

However, the bailout measures are entirely consistent with a kleptocracy looting the country, busting it out, and leaving the rest of us holding the bag. Privatized profits, socialized risk!

Hey, wouldn't it be just great if McBama were restoring stability to our financial systems through universal health care (number one cause of bankruptcy, leading to home loss) and HOLC?

Read what Bloomberg calls McBama's "populist" proposals and weep, or pound your head on your desk. Letting people empty their retirement accounts to pay for their housing is "populist"? What's WRONG with these people?

How about clawing back the $38 billion in salaries and bonuses the infestment bankers looted before their schemes went tits up, and putting that money into the pot?

How about socialism for everybody, not just Hank Paulson's golfing buddies?

NOTE That would be Obama advisor Paul "come together to protect our big banks" Volcker. I thought creative destruction was supposed to be good?

UPDATE There's an even more amazing Volcker quote further down:

``We will face a challenge in restoring a full, private environment for finance,'' Volcker said.

Well, now, that's interesting. Talk about a change in the Constitutional order! First, why do restore a full, private environment? Because Uncle Miltie says so? Second, if we don't, and we end up, as Volcker implies we will, with a partially public environment for finance, what should that look like?MR SUBLIMINAL Progessives! Oh, progressives! Usury-free sharia law's looking pretty good these days....

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

One thing that needs to be changed...

...is how the assets of a defaulting bank/brokerage are distributed. The extremely wealthy, who have the kind of money that makes high-risk/high-return investments a good idea for a big chunk of their portfolios are now on the same footing as pension funds and small individual investors who can't afford to (or shouldn't) make high risk investments.

New rules should be put in place that ensure that its "the little people" who get as much of their money back as possible, leaving those who can afford to take a big hit to suffer the consequences of their greed.

Just a reminder that Volker was big on imposing pain when he was

charged with fighting inflation under Carter and remained awhile with Reagan.

His tight money policy caused the highest unemployment rate since the Great Depression.

People tend to go back to things they saw as working for them previously.

And, it was mostly working class and lower middle class which paid the price, iirc.

Volker

worst appt Jimmy Carter ever made.

Stirling Newberry

Summed it up, I think, in terms of how the elite are seeing this crisis (emphasis mine):

When I see suburbanites setting up braisers and selling squirrel skewers, then I will know we've learned. Until then I think we are going to get the response of printing paper, and then having elites get together and figure out how to slice away another slab of middle class expectations.

In their minds, this is a paper crisis. In their minds the same people who were in charge before, will be in charge now, only with non-voting government shares on the books. The people like Instablunder who pimped this slide, will still be well paid and on the inside.

They weren't wrong, they aren't sorry, and that means it is going to happen again.

Right now, what we have are the elite arguing over how to keep this mess going so that they can continue to act as they have for the past 30 years (and that includes Volcker's time as head of the Fed). Middle and poor America will once again be told that there's no money to help them in any meaningful way while the elite scramble to keep the good times rolling for themselves. And I include Obama's tepid plans, which may be better than McCain's in that he's not going to bomb our burning house, but that doesn't mean he's currently* planning to do anything more than try to douse it with a 12 oz. bottle of Evian dressed up as a tax credit here and a brief moratorium on foreclosures there.

But so long as the focus is on how to fix and maintain the current system, instead of rejecting the last 30 years of economic bullshit the Chicago School has been peddling, we are fucked.

* I continue to believe there is a chance that Obama will modify his plans for his own political survival. The only question is how much pain will the country have to suffer before he gets his come to Jesus Keynes moment. My prediction - lots.

"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt

So, what would be your recommendation...

... as to the method to get Obama to have his Come To Maynard moment?

[ ] Very tepidly voting for Obama [ ] ?????. [ ] Any mullah-sucking billionaire-teabagging torture-loving pus-encrusted spawn of Cthulhu, bless his (R) heart.

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi