Je répète, re: "...Pelosi today said her top security adviser was part of a briefing in February 2003 in which he learned interrogators were waterboarding terrorists."
It's handy that those who were waterboarded are "terrorists," not "accused/suspected/purported" terrorists, etc. Illegal, inhuman, whatever -- a technique that is magically used only on guilty people is pretty impressive.
Arthur finds that Nancy's Senate counterpart is similarly aware of waterboarding's inerrant targeting. C'mon, if they weren't guilty of terrorism, why would they have been waterboarded? Case closed!
Also, it seems that Harry has a rather curious concept of how ordinary rendition works....
- vastleft's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page


Recent comments
1 hour 7 min ago
1 hour 14 min ago
1 hour 23 min ago
3 hours 7 min ago
9 hours 57 min ago
12 hours 19 min ago
13 hours 28 min ago
13 hours 55 min ago
17 hours 50 min ago
18 hours 25 min ago