Je répète, re: "...Pelosi today said her top security adviser was part of a briefing in February 2003 in which he learned interrogators were waterboarding terrorists."
It's handy that those who were waterboarded are "terrorists," not "accused/suspected/purported" terrorists, etc. Illegal, inhuman, whatever -- a technique that is magically used only on guilty people is pretty impressive.
Arthur finds that Nancy's Senate counterpart is similarly aware of waterboarding's inerrant targeting. C'mon, if they weren't guilty of terrorism, why would they have been waterboarded? Case closed!
Also, it seems that Harry has a rather curious concept of how ordinary rendition works....
- vastleft's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page

Recent comments
17 min 49 sec ago
2 hours 3 min ago
2 hours 5 min ago
2 hours 30 min ago
2 hours 32 min ago
3 hours 11 min ago
3 hours 51 min ago
3 hours 54 min ago
4 hours 11 min ago
4 hours 43 min ago