Versailles
is a sack of pus waiting to burst. And maybe the sack has started to leak. Mike Allen actually has a story:
For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post is offering lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those powerful few" — Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and the paper’s own reporters and editors.
The astonishing offer is detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he feels it’s a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff."
Any questions on why health care coverage is the way that it is?
The offer — which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters — is a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival
And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The Washington Post for its ethical practices.
"Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. ... Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders …
“Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typically on the guest list of 20 or less. …
Remember the bus tours they sponsored in CT, to view the palatial residences of the banksters? Somebody should sponsor one that stops at Katharine Weymouth's house. Somebody with a video camera.
“Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters’ CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 … Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m."
Nice to have all this out in the open.
I wonder if anybody from the A list has ever been at one of these "salons"? Just asking.
UPDATE WaPo starts to walk it back.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments



Front page

Comments
it is a sad day
when a lobbyist calls you out on ethics.
I wonder if this will get traction
outside the blogosphere? Wonder if any of the usual WaPo faces that populate the talking head shows will be asked about it? I guess we can expect to see the Michale Jackson coverage go to an even higher level to make sure no one has to mention it. Well, I bet the good folks at Fox might have something to say.
This is clearly unethical, but it is also unbelievably dumb.
Honestly, why would anyone want to pay for this allegeed access when the WaPo already has intrepid health care reporter Ceci Connolly doing it for them for free?
And am I wrong that the lobbyists are also already getting plenty of access to "important people" courtesy of the cash they keep pouring into campaigns and PACs.
I would love to hear the Obama administration's response to this, given the president's loud and frequent promises to change the way things are done in Washington.
I honestly think Obama sees his job
as completing the wealth transfer from the lower and middle classes to the upper classes. I think he was picked to make sure the health care industry, and the banks got to gouge the American tax payer for every dime they possibly could. And I'm sure there will be other inustries that want in on the money. What has the past eight years been other than outright theft in too many cases?
I don't think they have ever had any intention of creating a plan that is good for Americans Like the war in Iraq, like the out of control mortgage industry, like the rebuilding of the Gulf coast, the sky scraper cost of a barrel of oil, I think this about finding ways to drain even more money than they do now from Americans. Someone over at The Agonist posted an article about eating the seed corn. He said that Bush burned through our bank accounts and now Obama is burning through our remaining credit and when Obama leaves office, we'll have virtually nothing to work with. The nation will be broke and the middle class clobbbered.
I'll write my letters and make my phone calls, but I think Obama knows exactly what he intends to do and whatever it is, is going to completely fuck average Americans over and make the health insurance corporations even more fantastically wealthy than they are now.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays
Obama was the hedge fund candidate
Hillary Clinton received most of the health insurance donations.
Not exactly.
From Media Matters:
A Newsday article on Sen. Hillary Clinton's health care reform proposal repeated an assertion made in a 2006 New York Times article that the health care "industry contributed more than $850,000 to her re-election campaign, the second highest level of contributions to any senator." But Newsday did not note that the number includes donations from individual health care professionals, such as nurses and doctors, and neither newspaper reported that if only health care PAC donations were considered -- that is, donations from the actual health care "industry" -- Clinton drops off the list of top 25 congressional recipients of health care industry money entirely.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays
Well done, MM
n/t
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
oops
I stand corrected
LOL - It's so nice when someone is actually
happy to be corrected. The fact of the matter is that to find out that one of our presidential candidates was not the top recipient of health care PAC donations is always good news.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays
blogosphere
This is certainly getting plenty of attention within blogosphere
Good!
This doesn't seem all that different from Armstrong Williams' "favors" for the Bush Administration.
Think Progress, via Ezra Klein, updates:
Things that make you go, "hmmmm." The vetting was the problem. Sure.
"Does not represent what the company’s vision for these dinners"
Interesting. They don't deny they intend to hold these dinners or intend to charge for them. The only complaint is that the flier was crass enough to say you were buying access instead of claiming they were hosting an "independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers." Why that almost sounds noble!
It looks like the only mistake the business section made was telling the truth.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
They sent it out to the lobbyists for vetting
apparently.
So, er, who was the business division reporting to...
... and who OKed printing the fancy brochure, and why?
And why on earth did whoever approved this imagine it wasn't OK to talk to the newsroom?
This just stinks. It can't be true. Newspapers don't work that way. Even a corrupt enterprise needs a functioning chain of command.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
Maybe it's not corruption
More and more, I suspect it's just basic old human greed, selfishness, and stupidity. Everybody knows the system is falling apart, nobody thinks it can be saved, and the rats are all scrambling to get a piece of cheese while they can.
...for the rest of us
Read the non-denial denial again, lambert
The event was vetted, the flier was not ("the newsroom was unaware of such communication"). My guess is that the WaPo cooked this up and the business people printed it up in a way that would accomplish the business people's goal - to bring in money and the best way to do that is to push the access angle. The problem is that's a little too honest. What the WaPo really intended to do was sell access and bill it as "an independent, policy-oriented event". Notice the last sentence, it does not say "as structured, the newsroom could not participate" it says "as written." In other words, if you're going to be this blatant about it, we can't do it. If the business people would simple call it an independent policy oriented event for newsmakers - even though it would as a practical matter involve the exact same fucking conduct and be the exact same fucking event - the newsroom would apparently be fine with it.
The only mistake the business people made was being honest about what the WaPo was doing.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
So, the reporters would prefer to be courtesans
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
Well that fixes it!
Just like this fixes a flat tire problem:

NPR actually noted that the WaPoo REALLY stepped in it
with this little gambit.
Post Draws Criticism For Bid To Sell Access -- audio at link.
"Salons" now cancelled.
Didn't courtesans hold salons?
Absolutely horrible
From the use of the term 'salon' to the very act of what they were planning to do. You can't even make this stuff up. They may as well formally start calling themselves Versailles
. This is, quite frankly, media prostitution.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...
An Obit FOR the WaPo
From Free Court Press (aka The Hillman Foundation). My favorite part:
They did repudiate it, but I still think it was fatal. They just admitted publicly what we all suspected they do privately.
"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt
That's the tragedy of it all
The marketer did nothing more than tell the unspoken truth.
Which shows that WaPo really is in a bad way, since they can't even hire competent marketers any more.
"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mahatma Gandhi
That's just pitiful
This is teh stupid at its best (or worst). All your morals are belong to us, now, WaPo.
"I don't appreciate that kind of talk"? Are you fucking kidding me?! That's the first thing to come to Kris Coratti's mind? WaPo, you've been dead for some time, but it's time to end this zombie paper's misery. lol
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...