... you've got nothing to lose. Go read MF.
- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
CorrenteCeci n'est pas une caption.
|
|
... you've got nothing to lose. Go read MF.
... keep the heat on!
Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.
No PayPal Account required! Thank you!
Per capita health care spending (2007):
United States: $7290
Switzerland: $4417
France: $3601
United Kingdom: $2992
Average of OECD developed nations: $2964
Italy: $2686
Japan: $2581
-- Bob Somerby
The text of HR676 (Medicare For All) as PDF (30 pages). The FAQ. Compare HR3200 with HR676.
Medicare for All would save $350 billion a year (study in New England Journal of Medicine).
In 2003, a young Illinois state senator named Barack Obama told an AFL-CIO meeting, "I am a proponent of a single-payer universal healthcare program*." -- Bill Moyers.
* Medicare For All.
Holding partisans accountable.
Comments
This would be the same Monkeyfister
Who thought ill of me for criticizing Joe Biden's official rejection of "populism"?
Does it perhaps turn out that the Democratic ticket's reticence -- and even disgust -- about progressive values and framing has turned out to be something of an issue? Whocouldanode?
all good advice.
Here's some more. If you've never handled guns before, take a class. And buy trigger locks, and a steel locker to put the guns in, and a lock for the locker, and then use all of the locks - no exceptions.
One disagreement; MF:
Which would be fine, if the Democratic Party actually controlled Congress - but it does not. Just as in the 110th, the real power axis in both the House and the Senate is in an alliance between Republicans and BlueDogs. Until that alliance is pulled apart, they will continue to control the agenda.
The way to do that, IMHO, is to take to the streets and scare the living hell out of the BlueDogs. The demonstrations in Iceland's capital composed just 1% of the population, and after a couple of weeks the government collapsed. If 1% of Americans showed up in DC, 3,000,000 people, things in Congress would sure as hell start moving along.
Obama's rejection of progressive values and
his embrace of GOP rhetoric to attack Clinton pretty much defines the GOPs confidence in standing up to Obama. They know he is willing to sell out traditional Democratic values to win. They know he has neither principles nor backbone from the campaign. And his lack of principled behavior has edified their confidence. Obama was willing to split the Democratic party to come out on top. They know what he will do and where he will go. They know whose approval he craves (and it isn't the Democratic base) and they hold the key to it. Obama is both fearful and disdainful - they know how to push his buttons and will continue to do so.
This is why you don't elect an inexxperienced putz - even if he is charismatic. Obama has no history of accomplishment. He doesn't know how to get things done. He has never seen a social need, developed a solution and seen the solution through to completion - never even once. He doesn't know how to do it and the presidency is no place to learn. Now he is facing down the toughest motherfuckers with the nastiest lawyers in the world and he has no idea how to deal with them and when to call their bluff because he has never done this before.
I'm expecting him to be the worst Democratic president since Buchanan, and so far, it's looking like I may be right. Horrible. Disastrous. Avoidable.
"Someone needs to point out that elephants produce infinitely more shit than donkeys." Brad Mays