
James Leiber is a must read.* This paragraph caught my eye:
Secrecy shrouds the bailout. The 21 banks that each received more than $1 billion from the Fed won't disclose how, or even if, they're lending it, which hardly quells fears of hoarding. The Treasury says it can't force disclosure because it took only preferred (non-voting) stock in exchange for the money. [Coincidence!]
If anything, the Fed had been less candid. It stonewalls requests to reveal the winners (mainly banks and corporations) of $1.5 trillion in loans, as well as the securities it received as collateral. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) suit to obtain this information by Bloomberg News has been rebuffed by the Fed, which insists that a loophole in FOIA exempts it. Bloomberg will probably lose the case, but at least it's trying to probe the black hole of bailout money. Of course, Barack Obama could tell the Fed to release the information, plus generally open the bailout to public eyes. That would be change that we could believe in.
Jeebus, it's our money, so why can't we know what's being done with it?
And yes, I know that the Fed is not in the executive branch, and that Bernanke doesn't work for Obama. However, Obama has a great deal of political capital, and Bernanke, has little (at least in public). So, why does Obama remain silent?
Another suggestion from Leiber for Obama: Stop thinking of banksters as the campaign contributors and start thinking of them as racketeers. I'm sure RICO would have something to say to our financial elites.
NOTE * I'd want to check Leiber's narrative with people I'd regard as more expert, like Yves, or the Baseline Scenario, or CR, or Krugman -- any of the Cassandras. But at least it's a coherent narrative of the Big Shitstorm, and that's a plus, at this point.
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page





Comments
Another Nobel Prize winning economist says kill the CDS's
Per Bloomberg article:
Michael Collins posted the Bloomberg article on Agonist Newswire.The last paragraphs grabbed me (need to print out to read whole
thing):
The last is particulary scary and worrisome, given that this was published on January 27, nearly six weeks ago -- and the Obama administration seems to be signaling that determining what really happened and who did what is not on the table. You know, that old accountability crap which is only for the little people?
Thanks for bringing this to our attention -- I hadn't been aware something this wideangle had been published then.
There is no excuse for Dems, Obama, and admin folk to say they're behind the curve.