Will making Elizabeth Warren the one crumb Obama throws the left make Warren effective or the left happy?

lambert's picture

Krugman thinks so, and the usual useful idiots do, but I disagree.

For one thing, if The Big O really appoints her, he'll make sure to cripple her by surrounding her with bankster weasels picked by Rahm.

For another, it's policy that the left is consistently correct on, and it's policy that The Big O continually shits the bed on. So how is one appointment going to change that?

Finally, everybody knows Obama hates the left. So how is making Warren the left's poster child in the administration going to do anything other than render her an ineffective figurehead?

Of course, getting back in line in exchange for one appointment would make "progressives" look awfully easy. But then, they are easy. Awfully.

NOTE Of course, career "progressives" will be ecstatic. They'll have their "Honey, I've changed" moment. No doubt that will persist all the way through November, when it will be replaced, again, by a querolous need for re-assurance....

If you liked this post, buy the author some books.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
madamab's picture

Let's just say...

that NONE of the policy initiatives for which the "progressives" have agitated, have been taken by Obama. (Public Option Sparkle Pony, anyone?) So, I am suspicious of any initiative generated by them, which gives the appearance of succeeding.

This appointment would indeed be a really, really simple thing for Obama to make, and even simpler for him to undermine. Is he tone-deaf enough to refuse even that?

If so, I would say that he is counting on being a one-termer, since he is giving even his most desperately devoted followers nothing at all to cling to. (Bitterly.)

And, he's not invited to Chelsea Clinton's wedding.

Maybe Hillary IS running in 2012. See John W. Smart on this, a guy who is much more conservative than I am, but whose analysis on political matters is rarely wrong.

Never vote for people who hate you.

ERA Now!

The Widdershins

I'm glad you linked to John W. Smart.

I watched Fall of the Republic (which he put up yesterday) last night. As John says, watch critically, but "the analysis of Obama is spot on." He is the puppet-in-chief for globalist Big Money.

Hey, it's not a conspiracy theory when there are video clips.

Bill Black and Max Keiser are in it.

The most important point, considering the economic perspectives Corrente spends so much time on: A nation without manufacturing surrenders its sovereignty.

cg.eye's picture

The negative press about the wedding now makes sense.

That insistent press about the THREE MILLION DOLLAR WEDDING, the inconvenience that town faces (confidentiality agreements for vendors? Clutch the pearls!), the overall gaucheness that a girl whose dad and mom came from less now can have a dream wedding befitting a former POTUS and present Secretary of State.

Obama didn't get invited, you know, even though accomodating two presidents probably affect national security on the Easter Seaboard. Versailles, with a jet-assist by the OFB, are taking the opportunity to stick the knife in, one more time. Pishers.

Comments have been closed,

but you can vote to recommend number 5.

Added: Number 77 is good, too.

lambert's picture

Thanks, gmanedit

I recommended both. Krugman's got a super comments section, doesn't he?

In fact, if you wanted to monitor it regularly, getting the good ones voted up would be worth a post...

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Randall Kohn's picture

Somehow I don't think this dilemma will present itself.

Obama has already appointed Little Timmy as interim head. I don't think he'll pass up still another opportunity to disrespect his base, if only for shits and giggles.

JFK has been shot, we miss him a lot
He always knew what to do

-- Philly Cream

lambert's picture

I can't find a link on that

Do you have one?

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Randall Kohn's picture

Neither can I. Sorry for that evidently wrong comment.

I remember reading it, but I don't remember where. I checked my usual suspect sites along with Google, but no dice.

Getting old is hell. ;)

JFK has been shot, we miss him a lot
He always knew what to do

-- Philly Cream

Help the hamsters with their winter heating bill ...

… as they power the wheels that turn the servers at The Mighty Corrente Building. Please, won’t you help them keep their cages shiny?

No PayPal Account required! Give the hamsters immediate relief!

Or Subscribe to make a monthly payment!

Corrente is completely supported by contributions from readers. Thank you!

Download Citibank Plutonomy files

Part 1 [PDF]

Part 2 [PDF]

Good reading! Favorite quote: What could go wrong?
Beyond war, inflation, the end of the technology/productivity wave, and financial collapse, we think the most potent and short-term threat would be societies demanding a more ‘equitable’ share of wealth.

The 12 Word Platform

1. Medicare for All

2. End the Wars

3. Tax the Rich

4. A Jobs Guarantee

Senior fellows of The Mighty Corrente Building

Leah (CA), Lambert (PA/ME), RDF (??), BDBlue (DC), Hipparchia (FL), MsExPat (NY), letsgetitdone (DC), twig (LA), Tony Wikrent, (NC), jawbone (PA).

Corresponding fellows

danps.

Western Coordinator

coyotecreek

Correspondents

Health care reform: DCBlogger.

Fellows emeritus

mjs, Riggsveda, Tresy, Tom, hekebolos, chicagodyke, shystee, and Xenophon, Vastleft (MA), Sarah (TX).

Random term

Bad news (for the party in power) that's released at 5:00 PM on a Friday so that nobody has a chance to process it—except the people who released it, who start spinning it immediately, hoping that their version will take before the Sunday talk shows.

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Americans United is dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.