The Single Payer Pledge

I think CMike might be onto something:

Time for the Republic itself is running out. Single payer advocates have to take over the Democratic Party fast. We should band together as a bloc of voters and commit to voting for all pro-single payer Democrats and against all Democrats who do not support single payer. That means we should publicly commit ourselves to vote for the corporatist Republican in any general election if the Democrat on the ballot is not a supporter of single payer. At this point Job #1 for center-ists and leftists is to wreck the careers of the office seekers in the Democratic Party who hire themselves out to the corporatists.

And the last thing rank-and-file Democrats, who would commit to this one small step to make America a better place to live, need to listen to is some Democratic ditto-head telling us the savvy political move is to rededicate ourselves to supporting our party's sold-out leadership. Political realism, my ass. "Where do they teach you [ditto-heads] to talk like this?...Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here."

And before I get the "they're better than Republicans" talking point, let me just say maybe, but they're not better enough to be willing to do anything to stop 22,000 Americans from dying every year. Or put it another way, if it's a choice between your life and the Health Insurance Industry's profits, you lose.

These are the people who deserve your vote? Why? Because they'll pretend to care about you as they let you die.

So here's my thought* why not simply organize in your community a petition drive aimed at all Democrats running for elective office. See how many people you can get to take the following pledge:

Dear [Insert Name]:

We believe the health and welfare of the American people should be the top priority of any elected official. If you pledge to support single payer healthcare, I pledge to support you in the upcoming election. If you don't, I pledge that I will vote for your opponent in any primary and/or general election.

Signed,

American Voter

Work your neighborhoods, collect the pledges, mail them to the subject politician and then keep your promise. Do not vote for any Democrat who does not support single payer healthcare. If enough voters sign these pledges, that should get someone's attention. We need to make them unsure about their future.

This seems fair to me. Politicians are asking for your vote, the least they should be willing to do is sign onto a policy that can save 22,000 Americans a year, not to mention the added bonus of $400 billion.

What do you all think?

* I posted this because I'm not nearly smart enough to talk about Rawls and Kant and all those folks. Not that I don't agree with the need for more policy and less politics. But this, IMO, would be policy based, something that I agree has been missing too much from liberal politics. The GOP have been doing this to their folks for years and over time, it works. And we have something going in our favor, the Democrats are weak.**

** which isn't an excuse for their lameness. To paraphrase Bob Sommerby, they are corporate tools and they are weak. See how easy that is?

NOTE - I confess I can't quite decide which is the better strategy, to try to re-take the Democratic Party or to run third party candidates in a few contests, i.e., the Indiana and Montana Senate races. Of course, both could be done. Run a few well-placed third party (National Healthcare Party) candidates and in other districts pressure Democrats this way.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I'm not going to vote Repub...

But I will never again vote for a candidate who doesn't seriously support Medicare for All. What's the point? I just can not support people who won't stand up and fight for what is right.

Medicare for All is Civil Rights

the petition drive seems like a good start

i might have to try something like this on my fellow floridians. kendrick meek, yes, he of the spineless abortion stance, is a cosponsor of hr 676, and is looking to challenge our governor for the senate seat that comes open in 2010 [now that mel martinez is retiring]. i think he could be a good target.

as for voting for republicans, i did that already.

It's a tough, though thing to bring yourself to do

I've been at this voting thing for a while and I've never pulled a lever for a Republican yet. I just don't know what else to do at this point.

It Sure Is, CMike

I guess the do it argument would be - are more Max Baucuses really any better?

But that doesn't make votiing for nutjobs any easier. I think what would be easier, but I don't live in one of these states or districts, is to run a third pary National Healthcare Party candidate in swing districts/states. Then disaffected Dems (and Republicans, a lot of those voters actually support single payer) have someone to vote for other than the other party. And if you're talking an election that's decided by 5% of the electorate, your third party candidate doesn't have to win to get attention or influence the race/candidates.

That's the thing with third parties, I think they're daunting because people expect them to have to win power. When they don't. They just have to be successful enough to repeatedly endanger either (or both) party so that the party moves to capture the third party voters because if it doesn't, it loses elections.

And that gets to the bottom line, if you won't endanger Democrats or the Democratic majority - no matter how shitty they are - then they own you. Because they can win without giving you healthcare or ending the wars or doing anything else they should be doing. Sometimes you have to lose in the short run to win in the long run. The conservative movement understood this, liberals do not seem to.

"Do what you feel in your heart to be right -- for you'll be criticized anyway. You'll be damned if you do, and damned if you don't. " - Eleanor Roosevelt

Totally agree, BDB

But, since liberals are conscience minded people, we always look at consequences.

What were the consequence for the Conservative activists if the Repub party lost?

Not a lot. They got a few more years to whinge about the "liberal media" and still had policies that helped them line their pockets.

What were the consequences for the Liberal activists if the Dem Party lost?

More years of watching their neighbors and friends suffer, more years of war. So I can understand why liberals are having a hard time coming to grips with the fact that it really doesn't matter any more.

But one of the most important factors to being a liberal, IMO is our ability to accept evidence, like Bertrand Russell said. So I hope to see many more people abandoning the futile attempts to pull the Dems back into line, and start pushing them instead.

He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond

Ahem. Why do you pull on a rope?

'Cause it's damn near impossible to push one successfully.


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

I'm tired of pulling

And I'm tired of being pushed around, so it's time to push back.

Also, are the comments off on the FDR post on purpose, or is it that old bug again?

Because, I have to say I disagree that Obama doesn't have a compliant Congress. Congress would go where Obama is willing to lead, it's just obvious that "this" is where he wants to go, "this" being, trillions of dollars to Wall Street, no relief for taxpayers, and a health insurance deform designed to keep the insurance companies in business.

I'm sure if he asked his caucus enforcers to raise a ruckus in Congress, they'd do it. BTW, I'm not talking actual pushing and shoving, but perhaps, loud interruptions, day after day on the floor, would get their attention.

He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond

I guess it's a bug, Aeryl. Thanks for the heads-up.

goes over to monkey with the comment settings again ...

after pointing out that given the makeup of Congress today, they'd be on the coup's side.


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

Help Corrente ...

... keep the heat on!

Subscribe to make a monthly payment and keep the hamsters who keep the mighty servers turning in kibble.

No PayPal Account required! Thank you!

Recent comments

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.