Yes, we can!

lambert's picture

The great Charlie Pierce (via the Great Avedon):

I have now lived through three major episodes in my life where the political elite have told me quite plainly that neither I nor my fellow citizens are sufficiently mature to suffer the public prosecution of major crimes committed within my government.

The first was when Gerry Ford told me I wasn’t strong enough to handle the sight of Richard Nixon in the dock. Dick Cheney looked at this episode and determined that the only thing Nixon did wrong was get caught.

The second time was when the entire government went into spasm over the crimes of the Iran-Contra gang and I was told that I wasn’t strong enough to see Ronald Reagan impeached or his men packed off to Danbury. Dick Cheney looked at this and determined that the only thing Reagan and his men did wrong was get caught and, by then, Cheney had decided that even that wasn’t really so very wrong and everybody should shut up.

Now, Barack Obama, who won election by telling the country and its people that they were great because of all they’d done for him, has told me that I am not strong enough to handle the prosecution of pale and vicious bureaucrats, many of them acting at the behest of Dick Cheney, who decided that the only thing he was doing wrong was nothing at all, who have broken the law, disgraced their oaths, and manifestly belong in a one-room suite at the Hague.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but I’m sick and goddamn tired of being told that, as a citizen, I am too fragile to bear the horrible burden of watching public criminals pay for their crimes and that, as a political entity, my fellow citizens and I are delicate flowers encased in candy-glass who must be kept away from the sight of men in fine suits weeping as they are ripped from the arms of their families and sent off to penal institutions manifestly more kind than those in which they arranged to get their rocks off vicariously while driving other men mad.

Hey, Mr. President. Put these barbarians on trial and watch me. I’ll be the guy out in front of the courtroom with a lawn chair, some sandwiches, and a cooler of fine beer. I’ll be the guy who hires the brass band to serenade these criminal bastards on their way off to the big house. I’ll be the one who shows up at every one of their probation hearings with a copy of the Constitution, the way crime victims show up at the parole board when their attacker comes up for release. I’ll declare a national holiday—Victory Over Torture Day—and lead the parade right up whatever gated street it is that Cheney lives on these days. Trust me, Mr. President. I can take it.

 Bingo.

If you liked this post, buy the author some books.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
vastleft's picture

Perhaps the president's slogan should be revised

"No we mustn't!"

Did Obama just WORM Gibbs at his Q&A w/ king of Jordan?

Last question was for clarification of whether those who designed torture policies, ordered legal justifications be developed, wrote those justifications, and admin officials who continued torture policies should not be prosecuted or investigated.

Longish answer from Obama with a phrase about how it's hard work being president, hard decisions to be made, etc; then he kicked the can over to Justice) seemed to end up with Obama saying it was all up to Eric Holder.

Awaiting transcripts of answer...as there may be WORMs within WORMs. And new WORMs may come forth....

Will Holder order investigations? Or has he been convinced by his boss's aversion to appearing politicized so that he will avoid any such things???

This will tell more about both Obama and Holder, imho.

But, answer seemed to clearly rebut Gibbs' reply to reporters that there would be no going back, just forward. Obama did try to parse any investigations as somehow not looking back (only generalizations? no specifics?), that there had been a national mistake (huh? how about BushCo mistake?), and nothing should be "politicized."

I think someone needs to ask Obama just what he thinks "politicization" means. It may not be what the public thinks it means....

T/U, T/U, T/U for this Charlie Pierce piece. Says what I've been writing and thinking so much better than I! T/U, Lambert, for posting this.

pie's picture

Charlie

nailed it. I was cheering all the way through as I read it. It may be hard for some to see these prosecutions, but it'll be harder on the rest of us if there aren't any.

For a long, long time.

Still looking for transcript--this blog entry notes Rahm WORMed

as well as Gibbs. FromKansas City Star by Bill Dalton :

President Barack Obama is leaving the door open to possible prosecution of Bush administration officials who devised harsh terrorism-era interrogation tactics. He also said today that he worries about the impact of high-intensity hearings on how detainees were treated under former President George W. Bush.

But Obama did say, nevertheless, he could support a congressional investigation if it were conducted in a bipartisan way. Obama has said he does not support charging CIA agents and interrogators who took part in waterboarding and other harsh interrogation tactics, acting on advice from superiors that such practices were legal. But he also said that it is up to the attorney general whether to prosecute Bush administration lawyers who wrote the memos approving these tactics.

Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, had said this weekend that the Obama adminstration would not seek prosecution of the Bush administration lawyers.

Delete of double post--first didn't show up, thot it was lost

Ooops.

lambert's picture

You mean, you're not a fragile flower?

With delicate sensibilities? Haw.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

pie's picture

TPM reports that

White House: Rahm Didn't Mean What He Said On Not Prosecuting Bushies For Torture and then there are Sheldon Whitehouse's comments on Rachel's show last night.

Hmmmm. Interesting. The plot sickens.

What is a grouping of WORMs called? A cluster of cats can be

a chowder of cats, along with other terms.

But, this is turning out to be a fine mess of WORMs! Turning WORMs, reproducing WORMs, disappearing WORMs, evolving WORMs. My, oh, my.

A regular As the WORM Turns daily soap opera.

Does Gibbs have any pattern of getting ahead of his president? I doubt he came up with his response all on his own. So, there's been some Change! Changin' goin' on!

oceansandmountains's picture

A clew of worms

According to this website the correct word is "clew." How provident that it allows for clever word-play on the word "clue."

The WORM without a clue, anyone??

lambert's picture

Clowder, I believe

Not chowder.

Although chowder is a nice picture.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Sarah's picture

chowder of cats, eh? Good stinkin' thing, lambert,

I can't hide-rate comments here. That "nice picture" remark offended me. Not just because I find the picture anything but nice, but because, particularly in light of the polo episode, I'm probably unusually sensitive to cruelty to dumb beasts (as opposed to cruelty to the animals in charge of the Village).


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

oceansandmountains's picture

Get some therapy

As the owner of (or owned by) several rescued strays, I am shocked at the deaths of the horses but, seriously, offended by lambert's comment? C'mon.

Sarah's picture

Therapy? Why, when all I need to do

is not repress my revulsion at inhumanity?


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

lambert's picture

Oh, sorry

I can see how you might envision them being diced and chopped up. Not what I meant.

I was just picturing the cats covered with clam broth and cream.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Sarah's picture

Clam broth and cream, eh?

Okay. I can see some of the felines I know enjoying cleaning that off their own, and each other's, fur. A bath, as opposed to a stew.

Smile better.

(revises mental image of chunky tomato-infested cauldrons)


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

lambert's picture

No, that wasn't my picture

I can see how you would make that connection with the Hunter Thompson quote I posted, but the connection was not present in my mind.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Sarah's picture

You didn't foresee my reaction. I understand.

I can forgive the lack of omniscience. Can you forgive the reaction to it?


We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0

1 John 4:18

lambert's picture

Nothing to forgive!

No sweat.

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

vastleft's picture

Well, we New Englanders never put chunky tomatoes

In our cat chowder. Maybe a hint of tomato in the Burmese bisque.

Corner Stone's picture

Chow-deyrh (pronounced like the Quimby relative in The Simpsons)

Actually, I didn't even think of a consumable dish at all. Just pictured a bunch of kittens mewling around together. Thought it was a cute term and am now disappointed to learn the real word is Clowder, or something.

Here's a post debunking most of the collective nouns for animals

as a sort of early parlor game; then a book of the lists was published. Some terms have stuck, but writer thinks most were fanciful and not really part of the language.

Distraction time!

Color me red-faced with embarrassment: Not chowder, but clowder!

And I even posted on the naming of groups of cats awhile ago. As I typed "chowder," I wondered why it was used, thought it might be the lumpy consistency of chowder reminded people of the lumpiness of cats sleeping close together, entwined. Ooof.

Thanks for correcting this.

A clew of WORMs! Too cool.

Damon's picture

The Diet of WORMs

This is a veritable Diet of WORMs.

Pierce gets a Bingo x 10, on this one. He strikes a visceral chord with me with this piece, as I'd written about this in my blog on 11 dimensional chess:

Either way, I find this idea unsettling because of all the things that it implies. First, it implies that a national consituency isn't up to the task of, and can't/shouldn't be trusted with, handling the truth. It implies an unintelligent and undiscerning populace, one that must be tricked, from the highest level of government, into doing what the leader sees is best for it. It's a very dim and cynical view of government.

I was speaking on behavioral economics, but it fits this issue like a glove because it's become a pattern, that is, the insulting of our intelligence and the perpetual underestimation of our strength, as if many of us don't live through social trauma on a daily basis.

Conservatives love to characterize this nation as a "nation of laws", but when it comes to something like torture, something not only illegal but immoral and against the spirit of the United States, they are missing in action or, worse, apologizing for it.

This is why I can't for the life of me understand why when given a choice between placing himself on the side of defending the people and spirit of the nation or placing himself amongst torture advocates and sympathizers, it seems to absolutely pain him to choose the right side.

This is not a Sophie's Choice. This is not brain surgery. I'm tired of our president practically complaining about how hard it is to be president. If you weren't ready to make these kinds of decisions, you should have never wasted our time. And, if it isn't easy to make this decision of all decisions you've had to make, then you need to get out of the kitchen.

I know a certain woman who'd have had no qualms about which side to come down on...

Yes we can; yes we should; yes, we must.

But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...

Damon's picture

Frank

Let me be more succinct and more frank:

If one feels it more unseemly to let justice run its inevitable course all of the asses of torturers and its sympathizers because it may be "divisive", than to impede this justice, thus condoning torture...well, you're not on my side.

A request: To those torture advocates and sympathizers/apologists, to the George Will's, Cokie Robert's and Rahm Emanuel's, if you're not going to fight for the upholding of the Constitution and America's founding values, please do be courteous, and get the hell out of the way.

Thank you in advance.

But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...

With posts such as Ian Welsh's around, no wonder there's been

some Change.

What Obama's Refusal to Investigate Torture Says About America

American Experiment RIP

Is Comparing America to Germany Absurd?

These three brief pieces burn with white hot anger and freeze with their cold, hard reasoning. The pain of loss of ideals covers them all.

Can the turning WORMs prevent great loss of Obama's reputation? Of our nation's reputation?

pie's picture

You know, this latest Cheney ploy

to have documents released that prove substantive info was obtained during torture sounds like an attempt to plant *WMD's* before starting a war or once we invaded. He couldn't get away with that, so he's made sure that the bases are better covered this time.

It still doesn't justify the actions of the Bush administration, however, or make them legal.

lambert's picture

I would also want anything from Cheney authenticated

Remember the Yellowcake forgeries?

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi

Continue the obfuscation, confusion, lies. Worked before, just

may work again.

Cheney is certainly a lively contributor to the public discourse, for a former VP out of office such a short time.

Help the hamsters with their winter heating bill ...

… as they power the wheels that turn the servers at The Mighty Corrente Building. Please, won’t you help them keep their cages shiny?

No PayPal Account required! Give the hamsters immediate relief!

Or Subscribe to make a monthly payment!

Corrente is completely supported by contributions from readers. Thank you!

Download Citibank Plutonomy files

Part 1 [PDF]

Part 2 [PDF]

Good reading! Favorite quote: What could go wrong?
Beyond war, inflation, the end of the technology/productivity wave, and financial collapse, we think the most potent and short-term threat would be societies demanding a more ‘equitable’ share of wealth.

The 12 Word Platform

1. Medicare for All

2. End the Wars

3. Tax the Rich

4. A Jobs Guarantee

Senior fellows of The Mighty Corrente Building

Leah (CA), Lambert (PA/ME), RDF (??), BDBlue (DC), Hipparchia (FL), MsExPat (NY), letsgetitdone (DC), twig (LA), Tony Wikrent, (NC), jawbone (PA).

Corresponding fellows

danps.

Western Coordinator

coyotecreek

Correspondents

Health care reform: DCBlogger.

Fellows emeritus

mjs, Riggsveda, Tresy, Tom, hekebolos, chicagodyke, shystee, and Xenophon, Vastleft (MA), Sarah (TX).

Random term

Fuck you; fuck off. Usage example: How does a Tennesee woman say "Fuck ____"? "Bless her heart."

I support Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Americans United is dedicated to preserving the constitutional principle of church-state separation as the only way to ensure religious freedom for all Americans.