
The great Charlie Pierce (via the Great Avedon):
I have now lived through three major episodes in my life where the political elite have told me quite plainly that neither I nor my fellow citizens are sufficiently mature to suffer the public prosecution of major crimes committed within my government.
The first was when Gerry Ford told me I wasn’t strong enough to handle the sight of Richard Nixon in the dock. Dick Cheney looked at this episode and determined that the only thing Nixon did wrong was get caught.
The second time was when the entire government went into spasm over the crimes of the Iran-Contra gang and I was told that I wasn’t strong enough to see Ronald Reagan impeached or his men packed off to Danbury. Dick Cheney looked at this and determined that the only thing Reagan and his men did wrong was get caught and, by then, Cheney had decided that even that wasn’t really so very wrong and everybody should shut up.
Now, Barack Obama, who won election by telling the country and its people that they were great because of all they’d done for him, has told me that I am not strong enough to handle the prosecution of pale and vicious bureaucrats, many of them acting at the behest of Dick Cheney, who decided that the only thing he was doing wrong was nothing at all, who have broken the law, disgraced their oaths, and manifestly belong in a one-room suite at the Hague.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but I’m sick and goddamn tired of being told that, as a citizen, I am too fragile to bear the horrible burden of watching public criminals pay for their crimes and that, as a political entity, my fellow citizens and I are delicate flowers encased in candy-glass who must be kept away from the sight of men in fine suits weeping as they are ripped from the arms of their families and sent off to penal institutions manifestly more kind than those in which they arranged to get their rocks off vicariously while driving other men mad.
Hey, Mr. President. Put these barbarians on trial and watch me. I’ll be the guy out in front of the courtroom with a lawn chair, some sandwiches, and a cooler of fine beer. I’ll be the guy who hires the brass band to serenade these criminal bastards on their way off to the big house. I’ll be the one who shows up at every one of their probation hearings with a copy of the Constitution, the way crime victims show up at the parole board when their attacker comes up for release. I’ll declare a national holiday—Victory Over Torture Day—and lead the parade right up whatever gated street it is that Cheney lives on these days. Trust me, Mr. President. I can take it.
Bingo.
If you liked this post, buy the author some books.- lambert's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 1+[CSE]+#b94+


Front page





Comments
Perhaps the president's slogan should be revised
"No we mustn't!"
Did Obama just WORM Gibbs at his Q&A w/ king of Jordan?
Last question was for clarification of whether those who designed torture policies, ordered legal justifications be developed, wrote those justifications, and admin officials who continued torture policies should not be prosecuted or investigated.
Longish answer from Obama with a phrase about how it's hard work being president, hard decisions to be made, etc; then he kicked the can over to Justice) seemed to end up with Obama saying it was all up to Eric Holder.
Awaiting transcripts of answer...as there may be WORMs within WORMs. And new WORMs may come forth....
Will Holder order investigations? Or has he been convinced by his boss's aversion to appearing politicized so that he will avoid any such things???
This will tell more about both Obama and Holder, imho.
But, answer seemed to clearly rebut Gibbs' reply to reporters that there would be no going back, just forward. Obama did try to parse any investigations as somehow not looking back (only generalizations? no specifics?), that there had been a national mistake (huh? how about BushCo mistake?), and nothing should be "politicized."
I think someone needs to ask Obama just what he thinks "politicization" means. It may not be what the public thinks it means....
T/U, T/U, T/U for this Charlie Pierce piece. Says what I've been writing and thinking so much better than I! T/U, Lambert, for posting this.
Charlie
nailed it. I was cheering all the way through as I read it. It may be hard for some to see these prosecutions, but it'll be harder on the rest of us if there aren't any.
For a long, long time.
Still looking for transcript--this blog entry notes Rahm WORMed
as well as Gibbs. FromKansas City Star by Bill Dalton :
Delete of double post--first didn't show up, thot it was lost
Ooops.
You mean, you're not a fragile flower?
With delicate sensibilities? Haw.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
TPM reports that
White House: Rahm Didn't Mean What He Said On Not Prosecuting Bushies For Torture and then there are Sheldon Whitehouse's comments on Rachel's show last night.
Hmmmm. Interesting. The plot sickens.
What is a grouping of WORMs called? A cluster of cats can be
a chowder of cats, along with other terms.
But, this is turning out to be a fine mess of WORMs! Turning WORMs, reproducing WORMs, disappearing WORMs, evolving WORMs. My, oh, my.
A regular As the WORM Turns daily soap opera.
Does Gibbs have any pattern of getting ahead of his president? I doubt he came up with his response all on his own. So, there's been some Change! Changin' goin' on!
A clew of worms
According to this website the correct word is "clew." How provident that it allows for clever word-play on the word "clue."
The WORM
without a clue, anyone??
Clowder, I believe
Not chowder.
Although chowder is a nice picture.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
chowder of cats, eh? Good stinkin' thing, lambert,
I can't hide-rate comments here. That "nice picture" remark offended me. Not just because I find the picture anything but nice, but because, particularly in light of the polo episode, I'm probably unusually sensitive to cruelty to dumb beasts (as opposed to cruelty to the animals in charge of the Village
).
We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0
1 John 4:18
Get some therapy
As the owner of (or owned by) several rescued strays, I am shocked at the deaths of the horses but, seriously, offended by lambert's comment? C'mon.
Therapy? Why, when all I need to do
is not repress my revulsion at inhumanity?
We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0
1 John 4:18
Oh, sorry
I can see how you might envision them being diced and chopped up. Not what I meant.
I was just picturing the cats covered with clam broth and cream.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Clam broth and cream, eh?
Okay. I can see some of the felines I know enjoying cleaning that off their own, and each other's, fur. A bath, as opposed to a stew.
(revises mental image of chunky tomato-infested cauldrons)
We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0
1 John 4:18
No, that wasn't my picture
I can see how you would make that connection with the Hunter Thompson quote I posted, but the connection was not present in my mind.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
You didn't foresee my reaction. I understand.
I can forgive the lack of omniscience. Can you forgive the reaction to it?
We can admit that we’re killers … but we’re not going to kill today. That’s all it takes! ~ Captain James T. Kirk, Stardate 3193.0
1 John 4:18
Nothing to forgive!
No sweat.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Well, we New Englanders never put chunky tomatoes
In our cat chowder. Maybe a hint of tomato in the Burmese bisque.
Chow-deyrh (pronounced like the Quimby relative in The Simpsons)
Actually, I didn't even think of a consumable dish at all. Just pictured a bunch of kittens mewling around together. Thought it was a cute term and am now disappointed to learn the real word is Clowder, or something.
Here's a post debunking most of the collective nouns for animals
as a sort of early parlor game; then a book of the lists was published. Some terms have stuck, but writer thinks most were fanciful and not really part of the language.
Distraction time!
Color me red-faced with embarrassment: Not chowder, but clowder!
And I even posted on the naming of groups of cats awhile ago. As I typed "chowder," I wondered why it was used, thought it might be the lumpy consistency of chowder reminded people of the lumpiness of cats sleeping close together, entwined. Ooof.
Thanks for correcting this.
A clew of WORMs! Too cool.
The Diet of WORMs
This is a veritable Diet of WORMs.
Pierce gets a Bingo x 10, on this one. He strikes a visceral chord with me with this piece, as I'd written about this in my blog on 11 dimensional chess:
I was speaking on behavioral economics, but it fits this issue like a glove because it's become a pattern, that is, the insulting of our intelligence and the perpetual underestimation of our strength, as if many of us don't live through social trauma on a daily basis.
Conservatives love to characterize this nation as a "nation of laws", but when it comes to something like torture, something not only illegal but immoral and against the spirit of the United States, they are missing in action or, worse, apologizing for it.
This is why I can't for the life of me understand why when given a choice between placing himself on the side of defending the people and spirit of the nation or placing himself amongst torture advocates and sympathizers, it seems to absolutely pain him to choose the right side.
This is not a Sophie's Choice. This is not brain surgery. I'm tired of our president practically complaining about how hard it is to be president. If you weren't ready to make these kinds of decisions, you should have never wasted our time. And, if it isn't easy to make this decision of all decisions you've had to make, then you need to get out of the kitchen.
I know a certain woman who'd have had no qualms about which side to come down on...
Yes we can; yes we should; yes, we must.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...
Frank
Let me be more succinct and more frank:
If one feels it more unseemly to let justice run its inevitable course all of the asses of torturers and its sympathizers because it may be "divisive", than to impede this justice, thus condoning torture...well, you're not on my side.
A request: To those torture advocates and sympathizers/apologists, to the George Will's, Cokie Robert's and Rahm Emanuel's, if you're not going to fight for the upholding of the Constitution and America's founding values, please do be courteous, and get the hell out of the way.
Thank you in advance.
But, we've always been at war with Eastasia...
With posts such as Ian Welsh's around, no wonder there's been
some Change.
What Obama's Refusal to Investigate Torture Says About America
American Experiment RIP
Is Comparing America to Germany Absurd?
These three brief pieces burn with white hot anger and freeze with their cold, hard reasoning. The pain of loss of ideals covers them all.
Can the turning WORMs prevent great loss of Obama's reputation? Of our nation's reputation?
You know, this latest Cheney ploy
to have documents released that prove substantive info was obtained during torture sounds like an attempt to plant *WMD's* before starting a war or once we invaded. He couldn't get away with that, so he's made sure that the bases are better covered this time.
It still doesn't justify the actions of the Bush administration, however, or make them legal.
I would also want anything from Cheney authenticated
Remember the Yellowcake forgeries?
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Mahatma Gandhi
Continue the obfuscation, confusion, lies. Worked before, just
may work again.
Cheney is certainly a lively contributor to the public discourse, for a former VP out of office such a short time.