Corrente

If you have "no place to go," come here!

You know, if Brooksie is this upset, Obama must be doin' somethin' right

Sarah's picture

Call me what you will -- naive, blindsided, gobsmacked, overcome, a turncoat, whatever -- if David Brooks, the New York times pundit, can be all "they don't know enough to do this much" a month into the new administration -- I can be thrilled.

Quoth David:

Over the years, I have come to see that Burke had a point. The political history of the 20th century is the history of social-engineering projects executed by well-intentioned people that began well and ended badly. There were big errors like communism, but also lesser ones, like a Vietnam War designed by the best and the brightest, urban renewal efforts that decimated neighborhoods, welfare policies that had the unintended effect of weakening families and development programs that left a string of white elephant projects across the world.
These experiences drove me toward the crooked timber school of public philosophy: Michael Oakeshott, Isaiah Berlin, Edward Banfield, Reinhold Niebuhr, Friedrich Hayek, Clinton Rossiter and George Orwell. These writers — some left, some right — had a sense of epistemological modesty. They knew how little we can know. They understood that we are strangers to ourselves and society is an immeasurably complex organism. They tended to be skeptical of technocratic, rationalist planning and suspicious of schemes to reorganize society from the top down.
Before long, I was no longer a liberal. Liberals are more optimistic about the capacity of individual reason and the government’s ability to execute transformational change. They have more faith in the power of social science, macroeconomic models and 10-point programs.

Well, David, the last eight years in particular and the last 30 in general, salted with memories of Nixon and Ford in the White House, have convinced me that everything you're afraid of is exactly what we need, my man.

Oh, and did you bother to really examine what went wrong with those "best and brightest" notions?

No -- you're too dedicated to the virtues of the last 30 years' inbred Beltway mindset.

Yet they set off my Burkean alarm bells. I fear that in trying to do everything at once, they will do nothing well. I fear that we have a group of people who haven’t even learned to use their new phone system trying to redesign half the U.S. economy. I fear they are going to try to undertake the biggest administrative challenge in American history while refusing to hire the people who can help the most: agency veterans who are registered lobbyists.

I worry that we’re operating far beyond our economic knowledge. Every time the administration releases an initiative, I read 20 different economists with 20 different opinions. I worry that we lack the political structures to regain fiscal control. Deficits are exploding, and the president clearly wants to restrain them. But there’s no evidence that Democrats and Republicans in Congress have the courage or the mutual trust required to share the blame when taxes have to rise and benefits have to be cut.

All in all, I can see why the markets are nervous and dropping. And it’s also clear that we’re on the cusp of the biggest political experiment of our lifetimes. If Obama is mostly successful, then the epistemological skepticism natural to conservatives will have been discredited. We will know that highly trained government experts are capable of quickly designing and executing top-down transformational change. If they mostly fail, then liberalism will suffer a grievous blow, and conservatives will be called upon to restore order and sanity.

It’ll be interesting to see who’s right. But I can’t even root for my own vindication. The costs are too high. I have to go to the keyboard each morning hoping Barack Obama is going to prove me wrong.

Getting rid of the lobbyists is step one. Stamping out that loathesome profession ought to be step two, but what the hell; I can wait until national unemployment is below 3% again, and we have single-payer healthcare available to every person in the US regardless of citizenship (a la the RHS model you conservatives disdain so wholeheartedly).

Because, you see, David, what's been done over the last 30 years has not worked.
The definition of insanity is repeating behavior and expecting different results.

I personally don't care whether Obama and the West Wing troops can use the (probably outmoded, contracted-to-a-Bush-crony) telephone system. I figure if they're smart they'll get out of their chairs, step across or down the hall, and talk to each other face to face -- and do the same with the people who do have ideas on how to fix the mess conservatives created, with the help of voices like yours, David.

0
No votes yet

Comments

bringiton's picture
Submitted by bringiton on

Brooks:

If Obama is mostly successful, then the epistemological skepticism natural to conservatives will have been discredited.

Brooks and his buddies will be destroyed politically if Obama's agenda succeeds.

The enemy of my enemy....

Sarah's picture
Submitted by Sarah on

because if Obama should succeed, not only the conservative movement but Rush himself will be publicly discredited.

Well, hell -- GO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I mean, yes, I love my country and I want it to succeed.

But, I want Rush Limbaugh's failure to be utter, abject, public, and complete. Soon would be good, too.

bringiton's picture
Submitted by bringiton on

lose-lose for them. Suhhhweeeet.

And just for clarity I don't view this as an Obama triumph so much as a triumph for liberal thinking, and we would most certainly have had this kind of movement with Clinton as well.

Obama is essentially a Conservative politically, but he is a liberal thinker. It is a huge improvement over what the Republicans offer and yes, if that process of liberal thought succeeds then "Republican conservatives" - really Radical Reactionaries - are finished for at least a generation and maybe permanently.

Limbaugh will clear off the planet soon enough; he is an ambulatory heart attack. If he can be defeated politically before then, that would be a bonus.

ElizabethF's picture
Submitted by ElizabethF on

may be skeptic about Obama's speech being a Republican who supported Bush policy. However, I have to admit I have the same skepticism. Obama offered up no less that 23 commitments last night. Some small and some very big: education reform, tax reform, SS reform, financial reform, law reform....that's alot of 'correcting' of the American government.

I, too, selfishly, want some success from this new administration. I guess I have to sayIf Obama is mostly successful, then the epistemological skepticism unnatural to this Democrat will have been discredited.

Turlock